23.11.2014 Views

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2.12. TASK 9 — TEST CAPABILITY<br />

Once a response capability has been developed, drills and exercises should be conducted. The<br />

drills will provide training and the exercises will test and verify the adequacy of the entire<br />

system, including the plans, procedures, facilities, equipment and training. After the exercises<br />

have been conducted, deficiencies should be identified, prioritized and corrected. The drills<br />

and exercises should be conducted in a sequence starting with the smallest organizational<br />

elements (e.g. monitoring teams) and culminate in a national level exercise. The performance<br />

during exercises for threat categories I, II and III should be evaluated against the time<br />

objectives suggested for the response functions in Appendix 10.<br />

2.2.13. TASK 10— ESTABLISH ONGOING QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) AND<br />

MAINTENANCE<br />

As a final task, all groups should develop the means to maintain, update, and validate the<br />

emergency response programme as described in Section 4.2, including:<br />

1. a review of plans and procedures;<br />

2. a review of training programmes;<br />

3. an exercise programme; and<br />

4. a feedback process for lessons learned during exercises and real emergencies.<br />

Long term staff and budget must be provided to ensure that the capability is maintained.<br />

2.2.14. ULTIMATELY<br />

Ultimately, the State should adopt legislation to clearly allocate responsibilities for<br />

preparedness and response for a radiation emergency. This should ensure that the functions<br />

and responsibilities of operators and response organizations are clearly assigned and<br />

understood by all concerned. In addition, a regulatory body should require that emergency<br />

plans be prepared for the on-site area for any practice or source that could necessitate an<br />

emergency response [2]. For facilities within threat category I, II or III “appropriate<br />

emergency arrangements shall be established from the time that nuclear fuel [or significant<br />

amounts of radioactive or fissile material] is brought to the site, and complete emergency<br />

preparedness as described here shall be ensured before the commencement of operation” (Ref.<br />

[22], para. 2.36). The regulatory body should ensure that these plans are integrated with those<br />

of other response organizations as appropriate before the commencement of operation. The<br />

regulatory body should also ensure that these plans provide a reasonable assurance of<br />

effective response in accordance with this publication in the event of a radiation emergency<br />

[2].<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!