23.11.2014 Views

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72<br />

A7 - ASSESSING THE INITIAL PHASE Threat category Responsibility<br />

Elements I II III IV V O L N<br />

In the emergency classification procedures, provide the instrument readings to be used as EALs (see<br />

Element A2.5) in order to indicate the presence of the conditions stated in Appendix 6 warranting<br />

declaration of different classes of emergency. The EALs should be in the units displayed by instruments<br />

available in the control room. The procedures should not rely on a single indicator as the basis for an<br />

assessment and, as much as possible, measurements should be used that are direct indicators of the<br />

condition of interest (e.g. water level in the reactor vessel). The procedures and operator training should<br />

address response of instruments under abnormal conditions, and should include warnings when<br />

instrument readings may be misleading. They should also address the response of area and process<br />

radiation monitoring and of other instrumentation essential during a severe emergency and during<br />

emergency system operations (e.g. recirculation mode following core damage). For reactors, the EALs<br />

should be consistent with Ref. [18].<br />

A7.3 Arrange to assess, during an emergency, radioactive contamination, releases and doses in the<br />

emergency zones to determine or modify urgent protective actions following a release. Arrange for<br />

monitoring of the environment and of the contamination of people (e.g. evacuees) within the zones.<br />

Include designated trained teams and instrumentation and arrange to assess the monitoring results in order<br />

to determine, modify or initiate urgent protective actions to protect workers and the public, using<br />

operational intervention levels (OILs) and making arrangements to revise the OILs to accommodate the<br />

conditions present during the emergency (4.71).<br />

For the predictable environmental release routes (atmospheric and water), provide <strong>method</strong>s to assess<br />

releases by these routes under emergency conditions. For these release routes, develop EALs for<br />

classification (see Element A5.3, A7.2) that indicate potential off-site doses warranting declaration of an<br />

emergency consistent with Appendix 6. These EALs should be in units directly measured by instruments<br />

(e.g. Bq/s) available in the control room and be calculated in advance assuming realistic (e.g. average)<br />

dispersion conditions. Provisions should be put in place to estimate the radionuclide mixture of releases.<br />

Develop <strong>method</strong>s to project off-site consequences implied by facility conditions (e.g. for unmonitored or<br />

future releases). This could be precalculated doses for different accident conditions as shown in Ref. [18]<br />

or computer models such as INTERAS [18].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!