epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...
epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...
epr-method (2003) - IAEA Publications - International Atomic Energy ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
72<br />
A7 - ASSESSING THE INITIAL PHASE Threat category Responsibility<br />
Elements I II III IV V O L N<br />
In the emergency classification procedures, provide the instrument readings to be used as EALs (see<br />
Element A2.5) in order to indicate the presence of the conditions stated in Appendix 6 warranting<br />
declaration of different classes of emergency. The EALs should be in the units displayed by instruments<br />
available in the control room. The procedures should not rely on a single indicator as the basis for an<br />
assessment and, as much as possible, measurements should be used that are direct indicators of the<br />
condition of interest (e.g. water level in the reactor vessel). The procedures and operator training should<br />
address response of instruments under abnormal conditions, and should include warnings when<br />
instrument readings may be misleading. They should also address the response of area and process<br />
radiation monitoring and of other instrumentation essential during a severe emergency and during<br />
emergency system operations (e.g. recirculation mode following core damage). For reactors, the EALs<br />
should be consistent with Ref. [18].<br />
A7.3 Arrange to assess, during an emergency, radioactive contamination, releases and doses in the<br />
emergency zones to determine or modify urgent protective actions following a release. Arrange for<br />
monitoring of the environment and of the contamination of people (e.g. evacuees) within the zones.<br />
Include designated trained teams and instrumentation and arrange to assess the monitoring results in order<br />
to determine, modify or initiate urgent protective actions to protect workers and the public, using<br />
operational intervention levels (OILs) and making arrangements to revise the OILs to accommodate the<br />
conditions present during the emergency (4.71).<br />
For the predictable environmental release routes (atmospheric and water), provide <strong>method</strong>s to assess<br />
releases by these routes under emergency conditions. For these release routes, develop EALs for<br />
classification (see Element A5.3, A7.2) that indicate potential off-site doses warranting declaration of an<br />
emergency consistent with Appendix 6. These EALs should be in units directly measured by instruments<br />
(e.g. Bq/s) available in the control room and be calculated in advance assuming realistic (e.g. average)<br />
dispersion conditions. Provisions should be put in place to estimate the radionuclide mixture of releases.<br />
Develop <strong>method</strong>s to project off-site consequences implied by facility conditions (e.g. for unmonitored or<br />
future releases). This could be precalculated doses for different accident conditions as shown in Ref. [18]<br />
or computer models such as INTERAS [18].