06.01.2015 Views

Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef

Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef

Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

There is significant variation between prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>in</strong> terms of resource allocation <strong>and</strong><br />

expenditure (see Figure 3.30), <strong>and</strong> allocation of resources is not fully consistent<br />

with the health status <strong>in</strong>dicators pattern. Estimated expenditure per person <strong>in</strong> 2005,<br />

for example, varied from approximately US$2 per person <strong>in</strong> Zambezia prov<strong>in</strong>ce to<br />

approximately US$5 per person <strong>in</strong> Maputo City, while data from the 2002/03 IAF<br />

suggests that 17.6 per cent of the population <strong>in</strong> Zambezia reported hav<strong>in</strong>g been ill<br />

<strong>in</strong> the previous week compared to a much lower 10.6 per cent <strong>in</strong> Maputo City (Van<br />

den Broeck, 2005). 48 It should be stressed however that the amounts <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.30<br />

are only very broadly <strong>in</strong>dicative of differences <strong>in</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> are <strong>in</strong> no way meant<br />

to capture all resources spent – expenditures by the General Common Fund, the<br />

Common Fund for Medic<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> some off-budget projects are not captured <strong>and</strong><br />

neither are expenditures on central-level adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>in</strong> Maputo.<br />

Figure 3.30: Indicative per capita prov<strong>in</strong>cial health expenditure, 2005<br />

14<br />

12<br />

US$ per habitant<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Niassa<br />

Cabo<br />

Delgado Namp.<br />

Namp. Zamb. Tete Manica Sofala Beira Inhamb. Gaza<br />

Central<br />

Central<br />

Hospital<br />

Hospital<br />

Maputo Maputo<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce City<br />

Maputo<br />

Central<br />

Hospital<br />

Allocated<br />

Executed<br />

Note: All allocation <strong>and</strong> expenditure figures <strong>in</strong>clude own receipts, recurrent budget, <strong>in</strong>vestment budget <strong>and</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

common fund.<br />

Source: Adapted by the MPD from M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, 2006<br />

Includ<strong>in</strong>g the Nampula, Sofala <strong>and</strong> Maputo City Central Hospitals <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

figures would produce even greater disparities. This is not common practice <strong>in</strong><br />

sectoral calculations of per capita expenditures because the Central Hospitals are<br />

<strong>in</strong>tended to be of benefit to the entire population <strong>in</strong> the region, not simply the<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> which they are located (Maputo Central Hospital also aims to provide<br />

some specialist nation-wide services). Their <strong>in</strong>clusion is however justified <strong>in</strong> an<br />

analysis focus<strong>in</strong>g on the poorest members of society, who have lower mobility <strong>and</strong><br />

are often unlikely to seek formal medical attention at all, let alone journey to a hospital<br />

<strong>in</strong> a different prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Were the Central Hospitals to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial per<br />

capita calculations, <strong>in</strong>ter-prov<strong>in</strong>cial disparities <strong>in</strong> health spend<strong>in</strong>g would be even higher,<br />

as is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.31.<br />

47 The World Development Report of 1993 recommended a m<strong>in</strong>imum package of US$12.00 per capita for low-<strong>in</strong>come countries. Other estimates<br />

are: US$9.24 st<strong>and</strong>ard under the “Better Health <strong>in</strong> Africa” (World Bank, 1994); <strong>and</strong> US$35 prescribed by WHO’s Commission on Macroeconomics<br />

<strong>and</strong> Health (WHO, 2002) to meet basic health needs towards the year 2007. The figures for Sub-Saharan Africa are taken from World Bank (2005),<br />

Table 2.14 – Health: expenditure, services <strong>and</strong> use.<br />

48 Niassa’s per capita expenditures are very high due to the higher costs <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g basic services <strong>in</strong> remote rural areas.<br />

CHILDHOOD POVERTY IN MOZAMBIQUE: A SITUATION AND TRENDS ANALYSIS<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!