Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef
Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef
Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 2.9: Households liv<strong>in</strong>g below the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e by number of children <strong>in</strong> the<br />
household<br />
100<br />
%<br />
80<br />
60<br />
64.9<br />
40<br />
48.5<br />
55.1<br />
33.2<br />
20<br />
23.7<br />
0<br />
0 1 2 3 4+<br />
Number of children per household<br />
Source: IAF, 1996/97 <strong>and</strong> 2002/03<br />
(ii) Deprivations-based measurement<br />
Under the st<strong>and</strong>ard def<strong>in</strong>ition of absolute poverty, children are def<strong>in</strong>ed as liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
absolute poverty if they face two or more severe deprivations (see Chapter I for<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>and</strong> types of deprivation). By this measure, the proportion<br />
of Mozambican children liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> absolute poverty <strong>in</strong> 2003 was 49 per cent, with<br />
significant disparities between urban (20 per cent) <strong>and</strong> rural (63 per cent) areas, <strong>and</strong><br />
between children from the poorest households (i.e. the first wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tile)<br />
with 90 per cent absolute poverty, contrasted with 4 per cent among the best-off<br />
qu<strong>in</strong>tile (fifth wealth <strong>in</strong>dex qu<strong>in</strong>tile).<br />
Break<strong>in</strong>g the deprivations measure down by prov<strong>in</strong>ce reveals that the proportion of<br />
children liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> absolute poverty is highest <strong>in</strong> Zambezia (75 per cent), followed by<br />
Sofala (59 per cent), <strong>and</strong> Nampula <strong>and</strong> Tete (55 per cent) (see Figure 2.11). Maputo<br />
City emerges as hav<strong>in</strong>g by far the lowest levels of poverty based on this measure.<br />
These results contrast strik<strong>in</strong>gly with those produced by the consumption-based<br />
measure. In particular, Maputo City only recorded 3 per cent childhood poverty on the<br />
deprivations-based measure, as opposed to 60 per cent under the consumption-based<br />
approach. Maputo Prov<strong>in</strong>ce showed a similarly vast gulf between the two estimates.<br />
This is expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the fact that the consumption-based approach does not directly<br />
capture the consumption of public services such as health, education, water <strong>and</strong><br />
sanitation, which are likely to be particularly concentrated <strong>in</strong> urban areas <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
particular around the seat of national Government.<br />
50 CHILDHOOD POVERTY IN MOZAMBIQUE: A SITUATION AND TRENDS ANALYSIS