Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef
Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef
Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The level of test<strong>in</strong>g for HIV among young people is also very low, estimated at less<br />
than 5 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2003. Beyond the lack of knowledge <strong>and</strong> high level of stigma, the<br />
lack of access to service rema<strong>in</strong>s a key constra<strong>in</strong>t for young people. While Voluntary<br />
Counsell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Test<strong>in</strong>g (VCT) facilities have rapidly exp<strong>and</strong>ed, from 18 centres <strong>in</strong><br />
2002 to 158 <strong>in</strong> 2005, these centres are attached to health facilities <strong>and</strong> there is limited<br />
geographical coverage. S<strong>in</strong>ce 1999, the Government has also rapidly exp<strong>and</strong>ed a<br />
network of Youth Friendly Health Services (YFHS), where young people from 10 to 24<br />
years of age have free access to <strong>in</strong>formation about HIV/AIDS. In 2005, there were 133<br />
YFHS <strong>in</strong> the country, cover<strong>in</strong>g about half of all districts. The YFHS are however mostly<br />
attended by young people from urban areas <strong>and</strong> less than 10 per cent of attendees<br />
are among the “w<strong>in</strong>dow of opportunity” age group (i.e. 10 to 14). In addition, very<br />
few YFHS offer test<strong>in</strong>g facilities. In the May 2006 <strong>Mozambique</strong> Youth Report on<br />
UNGASS, young people noted that “the existence of YFHS <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>and</strong><br />
districts has been an important achievement, but their location makes it difficult for<br />
young people to reach, due to long distances from their residences, that reduced the<br />
capacity for access”.<br />
7. The immediate <strong>and</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g causes of education deprivation<br />
The analysis below categorises causes as immediate or underly<strong>in</strong>g, although there<br />
is overlap between the different categories. A number of recent studies have<br />
provided <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the complex <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terrelated factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g school access<br />
<strong>and</strong> retention <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mozambique</strong>. This section draws largely on the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of two<br />
complementary studies. The first is a <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>and</strong> Social Impact Assessment (PSIA)<br />
conducted by the World Bank <strong>in</strong> 2004 to assess the impact of lower<strong>in</strong>g the costs of<br />
school<strong>in</strong>g (WB 2004). The second is a study conducted <strong>in</strong> 2004 aimed at assess<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the barriers to girls’ education at district level <strong>in</strong> Zambezia prov<strong>in</strong>ce (Just<strong>in</strong>iano et al.<br />
2005).<br />
A. Immediate causes of education deprivation<br />
The pattern of access to education has been described above, with characteristics of<br />
a child’s residential area, sex <strong>and</strong> age be<strong>in</strong>g key <strong>in</strong> characteris<strong>in</strong>g their access to <strong>and</strong><br />
progress through education.<br />
The immediate causes of education deprivation for Mozambican children <strong>in</strong>clude low<br />
uptake of education opportunities, low household <strong>in</strong>comes, lack of access to <strong>and</strong> lack<br />
of quality of education.<br />
(i) Direct education costs<br />
The direct costs of education are cited as a major barrier to children enroll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />
stay<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> school (INE 2003b: 74; Just<strong>in</strong>iano et al 2005: 25). Direct costs of education<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude school fees (until 2004), materials (such as books), food, uniforms or cloth<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>and</strong> possible <strong>in</strong>-k<strong>in</strong>d contributions to school upkeep. The 2002/3 IAF showed, for<br />
example, that 25 per cent of children aged 6 to 17 years who had dropped out of<br />
school gave the ma<strong>in</strong> reason as the cost of school<strong>in</strong>g (‘school is expensive’) (INE<br />
2003b: 74).<br />
Both fees <strong>and</strong> the non-fee related costs of education were thought by education<br />
guardians <strong>and</strong> education sector staff to be equally <strong>in</strong>fluential (before the suspension of<br />
fees <strong>in</strong> 2004) <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g about whether a child enrolled or cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> school<br />
(WB 2005:30). These costs were particularly significant for children of the poorest<br />
families (WB 2005: 42). There was some difference between rural <strong>and</strong> urban areas,<br />
with the <strong>in</strong>ability to pay for uniforms be<strong>in</strong>g more significant <strong>in</strong> urban than rural areas.<br />
CHILDHOOD POVERTY IN MOZAMBIQUE: A SITUATION AND TRENDS ANALYSIS<br />
153