Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef
Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef
Child Poverty in Mozambique. A Situation and Trend ... - Unicef
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Box 5.6: Informal child labour among small-scale tobacco farms<br />
In 2005, a study was undertaken by the ECLT Foundation to assess the <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />
<strong>and</strong> nature of child labour among small-scale tobacco-grow<strong>in</strong>g farms <strong>in</strong> several<br />
districts <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ces of Tete <strong>and</strong> Niassa, which are two of the seven tobaccoproduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
prov<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mozambique</strong>. 76 The study found that:<br />
• Prevalence of child labour: 80% of the tobacco-grow<strong>in</strong>g households put their<br />
children to work on the tobacco farms. This represents 68% of the children<br />
aged 6 to 14 years old <strong>and</strong> 90% of the children aged 15 to 17 years old.<br />
• Activities <strong>and</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g conditions: More than half of work<strong>in</strong>g children aged<br />
15 to 17 contributed to all tobacco related activities dur<strong>in</strong>g the crop season,<br />
while 75% of the children aged 6 to 14 performed tobacco related tasks<br />
occasionally. The children were engaged <strong>in</strong> tasks such as pick<strong>in</strong>g, cur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />
market<strong>in</strong>g of tobacco leaves. Assessment of the work<strong>in</strong>g conditions of the<br />
children found that there were various hazards faced by the children, rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from simple cuts to exposure to chemicals or extreme climactic conditions.<br />
• Payment for work: 40% of smallholder tobacco growers gave a wage to<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g children aged 15 to 17. 18% of work<strong>in</strong>g 6 to 14 year-olds were paid.<br />
• School attendance: 81% of the surveyed children aged 6 to 14 <strong>and</strong> 63%<br />
of the children aged 15 to 17 were attend<strong>in</strong>g school. All of the school-go<strong>in</strong>g<br />
children were attend<strong>in</strong>g only one shift (of a maximum of five hours a day). The<br />
age aga<strong>in</strong>st grade (distortion) rate was found to be very high (on average it<br />
took 10 years to reach level five). Drop-out was also a significant problem <strong>and</strong><br />
many children were not able to complete a basic education. The ma<strong>in</strong> reasons<br />
given for not send<strong>in</strong>g children to school were the distance from school (40%),<br />
the failure to meet cost requirements (21%) <strong>and</strong> early marriage or pregnancy<br />
(20%).<br />
• Ma<strong>in</strong> reasons given for child work: 39% of the <strong>in</strong>terviewed households<br />
considered that child labour was necessary to help the family <strong>and</strong> to <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
the work force. 23% <strong>in</strong>dicated that work<strong>in</strong>g was a learn<strong>in</strong>g process for the<br />
children.<br />
• Gender issues: Overall, 65% of the families had boys work<strong>in</strong>g on small-scale<br />
tobacco farms <strong>and</strong> 51% had girls work<strong>in</strong>g. Girls were much more <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />
domestic work than boys.<br />
Three ma<strong>in</strong> variables were identified as determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the frequency of child<br />
labour among the surveyed farms:<br />
1- Use of non-family labour<br />
Overall, more than half of the smallholder tobacco growers hired permanent<br />
<strong>and</strong>/or seasonal adult workers (57%). Compar<strong>in</strong>g households that did not employ<br />
additional labour from outside the family with households that did employ<br />
additional labour the study found that:<br />
- Households that did not employ non-family labour were more likely to make use<br />
of the labour of children aged 15 to 17 compared with households that did employ<br />
non-family labour (51% versus 39%).<br />
- Households that did not employ non-family labour were more likely to put their<br />
children to work on the farm all year long compared with households that did<br />
employ non-family labour (children aged 6 to 14: 28% versus 23%; children aged<br />
15 to 17: 54% versus 47%).<br />
2- Distance from school<br />
Approximately 40% of the respondent families lived more than 1.5 km from a<br />
primary school. Those tobacco-grow<strong>in</strong>g households liv<strong>in</strong>g more than 1.5 km from<br />
a school were found more likely:<br />
- To have their children out of school (children aged 6 to 14: 23% at over 1.5 km<br />
versus 9% at under 1.5 km; children aged 15 to 17: 35% at over 1.5 km versus<br />
30% at under 1.5 km).<br />
CHILDHOOD POVERTY IN MOZAMBIQUE: A SITUATION AND TRENDS ANALYSIS<br />
195