10.07.2015 Views

Islamic Political Identity in Turkey

Islamic Political Identity in Turkey

Islamic Political Identity in Turkey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the national outlook movement and the rise of the refah party 211sitional Muslim identity. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Altan Tan, a prom<strong>in</strong>ent Kurdish-Islamist<strong>in</strong>tellectual, the Kurds always supported the pro-<strong>Islamic</strong> parties, even on thoseoccasions when the party did poorly <strong>in</strong> the western prov<strong>in</strong>ces. Tan oVers tworeasons: “the most serious organizational framework for the <strong>Islamic</strong> movement<strong>in</strong> <strong>Turkey</strong> is of Kurdish orig<strong>in</strong>. The Kurdish region is where Islam traditionallyis lived.” 19 Tan argues that the “Kurdish negative reaction to this laic/Kemalistsystem is more religious than it is ethnic. . . . Both the MNP and MSP were basedon this traditional opposition to the system.” 20 By organizational framework,Tan means to highlight the role of the Nak7ibendi SuW orders and the Nurmovement, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>Turkey</strong>’s Kurds played a critical role.In the prov<strong>in</strong>ces where there is a sizeable Alevi population and traditionalconXict with Sunnis (e.g., Erzurum, Kahramanmara7, Malatya, and Sivas), theMSP did better than <strong>in</strong> those prov<strong>in</strong>ces where there was no sectarian tension.Other prov<strong>in</strong>ces where the MSP regularly <strong>in</strong>creased its vote were the SunniKurdish prov<strong>in</strong>ces of Elazì;, Adìyaman, Diyarbakìr, and B<strong>in</strong>göl. The identiWcationof Alevi voters with the Kemalist CHP helped the MSP to emerge as therepresentative of Turkish and Kurdish Sunni Islam.The ma<strong>in</strong> political challenge the MSP faced was the war over Cyprus <strong>in</strong> 1974.After occupy<strong>in</strong>g 40 percent of Cyprus and safeguard<strong>in</strong>g the threatened Turkishm<strong>in</strong>ority, Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister Bülent Ecevit and Deputy Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister Erbakanbecame national heroes. As people began to call Erbakan ghazi (a warrior of thefaith), Ecevit sought to erode the popularity of his rival and searched for anopportunity to end the coalition. 21 Although his plan for early elections failed,Ecevit eventually broke the coalition on September 18, 1974. However, the MSPjo<strong>in</strong>ed the First National Front coalition government led by Süleyman Demirel(April 1975 to June 1977), and Erbakan became deputy prime m<strong>in</strong>ister; otherMSP members became m<strong>in</strong>isters of state, the <strong>in</strong>terior, justice, food and agriculture,<strong>in</strong>dustry and technology, and construction.In the early parliamentary elections of 1977, the MSP’s share of the votedecl<strong>in</strong>ed to 8.6 percent, 22 primarily because of the emergence of the MHP, whichattracted popular support <strong>in</strong> the Sunni-dom<strong>in</strong>ated Turkish cities because of itsradical strategies of oppos<strong>in</strong>g leftist Alevi and Kurdish groups. In addition, theNurcu groups deserted the MSP <strong>in</strong> large numbers <strong>in</strong> 1977, tak<strong>in</strong>g with them 11seats <strong>in</strong> Parliament. 23 The party did not oVer any concrete solutions to thecountry’s problems and was seen as be<strong>in</strong>g overly ideological. 24 The MSP jo<strong>in</strong>edthe Second National Front Coalition, composed of the AP, the MSP, and theMHP, and held 24 seats <strong>in</strong> Parliament between July 21 and December 31, 1977.This government did not last long because there were profound political diVerencesbetween the coalition partners. In January 1978, Bülent Ecevit, the leaderof the CHP, established a new government by brib<strong>in</strong>g 11 ex-AP deputies withm<strong>in</strong>isterial posts. However, he failed to cope with ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>Xation and terrorism.Moreover, the oil crisis greatly exacerbated the hard currency and tradedeWcits. The local elections on October 14,1979, revealed the unpopularity ofthe Ecevit government and forced him to resign. On November 12, 1979, theMSP supported a m<strong>in</strong>ority coalition government led by Süleyman Demirel; thislasted until the September 1980 military coup.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!