13.07.2015 Views

Psychology of sex - Total No. of Records in System :: 2032

Psychology of sex - Total No. of Records in System :: 2032

Psychology of sex - Total No. of Records in System :: 2032

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SEXUAL DEVIATIONas Aristotle said, to be a master <strong>of</strong> metaphor, and here aGate <strong>of</strong> Hell is the wrong metaphor. We are not here onthe stage <strong>of</strong> a div<strong>in</strong>e comedy such as Dante presented, but<strong>in</strong> the realm <strong>of</strong> biology, where the physiologicalis for everpass<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the pathological, and blend<strong>in</strong>g with it almostimperceptibly, without the open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> any gate.The elements<strong>of</strong> pathology are already to be found <strong>in</strong> the physiological,and pathological processes are still follow<strong>in</strong>g thelaws <strong>of</strong> physiology. Every normal man <strong>in</strong> matters <strong>of</strong> <strong>sex</strong>,when we exam<strong>in</strong>e him carefully enough,is found to showsome abnormal elements, and the abnormal man is merelymanifest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a disordered or extravagant shape somephase <strong>of</strong> the normal man. <strong>No</strong>rmal and abnormal, taken<strong>in</strong> the mass, can all be plotted as variations <strong>of</strong> differentdegree on the same curve. The lov<strong>in</strong>g woman whoexclaims: "I could eat you!" is connected by l<strong>in</strong>ks, each<strong>in</strong> itself small, with Jack the Ripper. We all possess with<strong>in</strong>us, <strong>in</strong> a more or less developed form, the germs <strong>of</strong>atrocities.It is not, therefore, because it is "abnormal" that a<strong>sex</strong>ual act becomes reprehensible. That view once prevailed.A narrow conception <strong>of</strong> what is "natural" washeld; everyth<strong>in</strong>g else was "unnatural" and to be vituperated,if not to be punished, even severely punished, for itwas perhaps a crime, almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly a s<strong>in</strong>.<strong>No</strong>w that our knowledge <strong>of</strong> what is "natural" hasgrown, and the existence <strong>of</strong> endless variations <strong>in</strong> naturehas to be admitted, a different conception is tend<strong>in</strong>g toprevail.We f<strong>in</strong>d that we have to discrim<strong>in</strong>ate. The questionis no longer: Is the act abnormal? It becomes: Is theact <strong>in</strong>jurious? Society isnot concerned with the varieties<strong>of</strong> <strong>sex</strong>ual couples, but with the question <strong>of</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gthose variations which <strong>in</strong>flict <strong>in</strong>jury. That question is <strong>of</strong>some importance s<strong>in</strong>ce it is believed by experienced physi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!