13.07.2015 Views

Psychology of sex - Total No. of Records in System :: 2032

Psychology of sex - Total No. of Records in System :: 2032

Psychology of sex - Total No. of Records in System :: 2032

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PSYCHOLOGY OF SEXseparate fathers, is still more impracticable;she is necessarily"monogamic."In fact, that is the wrong word to use. The people whodiscuss whether men are more "polygamic" than women,really mean more poly-erotic.That is to say, not whetherbut more <strong>sex</strong>ual freedom. Tothey desire more marriagessay that a man is monogamic still leaves open the question<strong>of</strong> whether he is mono-erotic or poly-erotic,and if itis decided that he is poly-erotic, that by no means implieseither that he ispolygamic, or that he is promiscuous,which <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>in</strong>discrim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>sex</strong>ual attraction withoutselection, a state <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>gs not found, save occasionally <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>sanity. Much confused and futile discussion has beencaused by this ignorant misuse <strong>of</strong> terms.It would seem that most persons, women as well as men,are monogamic and poly-erotic. That is to say they onlydesire one permanent marriage, but they do not f<strong>in</strong>d thatthat relationship stands <strong>in</strong> the way <strong>of</strong> <strong>sex</strong>ual attraction toone or more other persons, though the attraction thusaroused may be felt to be <strong>of</strong> a different nature to thatexperienced for the permanent partner, and it may provequite possible to hold such attractions more or less <strong>in</strong>control. There appears to be no <strong>sex</strong>ual difference <strong>in</strong> thismatter. Women are fully as well able as men to experienceaffection for more than one person <strong>of</strong> the opposite <strong>sex</strong>,though on account <strong>of</strong> the deeper significance <strong>of</strong> <strong>sex</strong> forwomen they may be <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ctively more fastidious thanmen <strong>in</strong> <strong>sex</strong>ual choice, and on account <strong>of</strong> social and otherconsiderations more reticent and cautious than men <strong>in</strong>manifest<strong>in</strong>g or <strong>in</strong> yield<strong>in</strong>g to their affections.While, however, this seems the most frequent type <strong>of</strong><strong>sex</strong>ual attraction, there are other types and endless <strong>in</strong>dividualvariations. We must not assume that one special type<strong>of</strong> <strong>sex</strong>ual pattern is <strong>in</strong>variably <strong>of</strong> higher moral character

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!