13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72 • The Making of <strong>Islamic</strong> Scienceseventeenth century era, scientists who made <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> scientifictradition possible during <strong>the</strong> eighth and <strong>the</strong> sixteenth centuries weremore frequently also <strong>the</strong> authors of religious texts of an advancednature. This argument, however, has little relevance, because—asopposed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-Renaissance scientists noted earlier—<strong>the</strong> Muslimscientists of <strong>the</strong> pre-seventeenth century era did not see <strong>the</strong>ir religionand <strong>the</strong>ir science as two separate entities.Ano<strong>the</strong>r problematic argument stemming from <strong>the</strong>universalization of <strong>the</strong> specific interaction between WesternChristianity and science relates <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> notion that religious ritualsand celebrations related <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> calendar are a “reason” for scienceand religion <strong>to</strong> interact, as science and scientists help religiousinstitutions and authorities <strong>to</strong> prepare for <strong>the</strong>se rituals andcelebrations by furnishing required astronomical information. Theneed <strong>to</strong> determine <strong>the</strong> spring equinox for Easter, for instance, isconsidered a religious need that is fulfilled by science, and hencereligion is shown <strong>to</strong> have an intrinsic need <strong>to</strong> support scientificresearch for its own needs (Olson 2004, 3). This argument can besuperficially applied <strong>to</strong> Islam (as is often <strong>the</strong> case) with much moreforce, because in <strong>the</strong> case of Islam, not only is <strong>the</strong> annual cycle ofrituals and celebrations dependent on astronomically determinedtimes but also daily practices, such as <strong>the</strong> five obliga<strong>to</strong>ry prayersand fasting. These obligations are called “religious obligations”in a framework in which some obligations are “religious” ando<strong>the</strong>rs are “nonreligious.” Because, however, Islam considers itselfa complete way of life (al-dîn) encompassing <strong>the</strong> entire spectrum ofhuman activities—making even <strong>the</strong> most ordinary act of removing aharmful thing from <strong>the</strong> road a “religious” act—<strong>the</strong>se categories and<strong>the</strong> arguments associated with <strong>the</strong>m become superfluous. What isperceived as <strong>the</strong> “need of religion” being “fulfilled by science” is thusa conception foreign <strong>to</strong> Islam, which naturally perceives <strong>the</strong> needsof humanity in terms of its obligations <strong>to</strong>wards <strong>the</strong> Crea<strong>to</strong>r, and sodefines a way of life for individuals and communities in which allneeds are (what would be considered) religious.In spite of <strong>the</strong>se differences between <strong>the</strong> cases of Christianityand Islam, <strong>the</strong> aforementioned conceptual categories of religion andscience discourse have been applied often and variously <strong>to</strong> Islam.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!