13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Mosque, <strong>the</strong> Labora<strong>to</strong>ry, and <strong>the</strong> Market • 73This has produced a body of literature that attempts <strong>to</strong> show thatwhile Christianity eventually accepted and even supported <strong>the</strong> newscientific knowledge that emerged in Europe in <strong>the</strong> seventeenthcentury, along with <strong>the</strong> institutional structures needed <strong>to</strong> establishscience on a solid footing, Islam did not; hence its failure <strong>to</strong> producea Scientific Revolution parallel <strong>to</strong> that of Europe (Huff 1995).Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, it is argued that this reveals something inherentlywrong with Islam in this regard—that it abhors innovation, freethinking, and objective inquiry, which are all considered necessarypreconditions for science. These studies <strong>the</strong>n attempt <strong>to</strong> show thatsince science is produced through innovation and freethinking, andsince in Islam “<strong>the</strong> idea of innovation in general implied impietyif not outright heresy” (Huff 1995, 234), science could not find ahome in Islam. Faced with his<strong>to</strong>rical evidence of <strong>the</strong> existence of aneight-hundred-year-long tradition of scientific research in <strong>Islamic</strong>civilization, <strong>the</strong>se studies <strong>the</strong>n consider it an anomalistic case of <strong>the</strong>survival of “foreign” (sometimes called “ancient”) sciences not becauseof but despite Islam.This “Islam versus foreign sciences” <strong>the</strong>sis was first propoundedby <strong>the</strong> Hungarian Orientalist Ignaz Goldziher (1850–1921) in hispaper entitled “The Attitude of Orthodox Islam Toward <strong>the</strong> ‘AncientSciences’” (Goldziher 1915), and it has since become a favorite poin<strong>to</strong>f departure for building a “conflict model” for Islam and science a laAuguste Comte and a host of o<strong>the</strong>r philosophers, including those whoconceive religion and science as nonoverlapping domains.Islam and Science: Aspects of <strong>the</strong>ir RelationshipUsing <strong>the</strong> conceptual categories inherent in <strong>Islamic</strong> understandingof knowledge—whe<strong>the</strong>r scientific or o<strong>the</strong>rwise—we can reformulate<strong>the</strong> question of <strong>the</strong> Islam and science nexus. Knowledge is ilm inArabic, a word that frequently occurs in <strong>the</strong> QurāĀn. Knowledge isconsidered meri<strong>to</strong>rious; those who know and those who do not know arenot equal, a verse of <strong>the</strong> QurāĀn tells us (Q. 39:9). The Prophet ofIslam said that “scholars are <strong>the</strong> inheri<strong>to</strong>rs of <strong>the</strong> Prophets.” He alsoadvised Muslims <strong>to</strong> “seek knowledge from <strong>the</strong> cradle <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> grave.”The acquisition of knowledge is virtuous; it ennobles humanity and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!