13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

212 • The Making of <strong>Islamic</strong> Science<strong>the</strong> unerring functioning of all <strong>the</strong> laws of matter according <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>irproperties, and <strong>the</strong> interplay of a wide range of dualities <strong>to</strong> producelogical results in <strong>the</strong> phenomenal world.In conclusion, let us mention a last example of <strong>the</strong> metaphysicaldiscourse on science. The writings of Syed Naquib al-Attas stand apartfrom <strong>the</strong> traditionalist school, but <strong>the</strong>re are several common featuresas well. His writings on <strong>the</strong> relationship between Islam and sciencecan best be unders<strong>to</strong>od within <strong>the</strong> integrated system of thought hedeveloped on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> application of traditional <strong>Islamic</strong>philosophy (hikmah) <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> contemporary situation. Examining sciencefrom <strong>the</strong> metaphysical perspective of Islam means a constructionthat takes in<strong>to</strong> consideration <strong>the</strong> authority of revelation, soundtraditions of <strong>the</strong> Prophet, and intuitive faculties granted humanityby <strong>the</strong> Crea<strong>to</strong>r. One key aspect of al-Attas’s views on modern scienceis <strong>the</strong> epistemological considerations he brings <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> discourse. Heobserves that <strong>Islamic</strong> metaphysics and modern science are based ontwo divergent foundations with regard <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir respective positionsconcerning <strong>the</strong> sources and methods of knowledge. “It is implicit inal-Attas’s conception of science as ‘definition of reality’ that ‘science’is <strong>to</strong> be unders<strong>to</strong>od in <strong>the</strong> wide sense of <strong>the</strong> term as any objectivesystematic inquiry, including <strong>the</strong> intellectual, psychological, natural,social and his<strong>to</strong>rical disciplines” (Setia 2003, 172). In his opinion,modern science and philosophy suffer from a myopia that limits ourunderstanding of reality. “God is not a myth, an image, a symbol,that keeps changing with <strong>the</strong> times,” he wrote in his Islam and <strong>the</strong>Philosophy of Science:He is Reality itself. Belief has cognitive content; and one of <strong>the</strong>main points of divergence between true religion and secularphilosophy and science is <strong>the</strong> way in which <strong>the</strong> sources andmethods of knowledge are unders<strong>to</strong>od. (al-Attas 1989, 3)Al-Attas’s critique of modern science considers <strong>the</strong> denial of <strong>the</strong>reality and existence of God—an implied component of modernscience—as <strong>the</strong> key source of all problems. Modern science conceives<strong>the</strong> existence of things in terms of <strong>the</strong>ir coming in<strong>to</strong> being from o<strong>the</strong>rthings, as a progression, a development or evolution. This perceptionof <strong>the</strong> world construes it as a self-subsistent system evolving according<strong>to</strong> its own laws.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!