13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

viii • The Making of <strong>Islamic</strong> Sciencemodel itself remains anchored in <strong>the</strong> foundational paradigm thatconsiders religion and science as two separate and distinct entities.The two-entity model has evolved from a specific cultural,his<strong>to</strong>rical, and scientific background, and it is supported by episodesfrom <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry of interaction between science and Christianity in<strong>the</strong> Western world. It is, however, now being claimed that this modelis universal, and can be used <strong>to</strong> understand <strong>the</strong> relationship betweenall scientific traditions and all religions (Barbour 2002). While thismodel has been criticized for certain shortcomings, this criticism hasfor <strong>the</strong> most part itself remained within <strong>the</strong> two-entity framework(Can<strong>to</strong>r and Kenny 2001).Since science, as we understand it <strong>to</strong>day, is generally taken<strong>to</strong> be <strong>the</strong> large scale, organized activity whose roots go back <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>European Scientific Revolution of <strong>the</strong> seventeenth century, andsince this particular scientific tradition has had a series of conflictswith Christianity, <strong>the</strong> “conflict model” has gained credibility bothin <strong>the</strong> scholarly world as well as in <strong>the</strong> popular mind. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,since <strong>the</strong> science begotten by <strong>the</strong> European Scientific Revolutionhas now spread <strong>to</strong> all corners of <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>the</strong> particular his<strong>to</strong>ryof <strong>the</strong> interaction of science and <strong>the</strong> religion also seems <strong>to</strong> haveaccompanied this spread of science: <strong>the</strong> only adjustment deemednecessary is <strong>the</strong> substitution of Christianity with Islam or o<strong>the</strong>rreligions of <strong>the</strong> world.This model is also being applied retrospectively. Thus, <strong>the</strong>standard narrative about Islam and science seeks instances ofconflict or cooperation between Islam <strong>the</strong> religion and <strong>the</strong> scientifictradition that emerged in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> civilization. This approachmakes no distinction between premodern and modern science asfar as <strong>the</strong>ir philosophical foundations are concerned, despite certainfundamental differences between <strong>the</strong> worldviews that gave birth <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> two scientific traditions.Given this background, we must first ask a basic question: is <strong>the</strong>two-entity model—arising out of a particular cultural, his<strong>to</strong>rical,and scientific background—truly applicable <strong>to</strong> all religions andall scientific traditions? The answer is ra<strong>the</strong>r obvious. This modelcan only be applicable <strong>to</strong> all religious and scientific traditions if, (i)nature—<strong>the</strong> subject matter of science—and its relationship with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!