13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Mosque, <strong>the</strong> Labora<strong>to</strong>ry, and <strong>the</strong> Market • 109existence of God would have been conclusively demonstrated only ifshown <strong>to</strong> follow from both <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis of <strong>the</strong> world’s eternity andits creation (Ibn Tufayl, tr. 1972, 81–86).These debates came in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> tradition from Greek sourcesalong with <strong>the</strong> entire s<strong>to</strong>ck of commentaries on Aris<strong>to</strong>tle’s originalproof for <strong>the</strong> existence of God. The translation movement also broughtin<strong>to</strong> Arabic <strong>the</strong> entire s<strong>to</strong>ck of refutations of Aris<strong>to</strong>tle’s arguments,most important <strong>the</strong> refutation of John Philoponus, who systematicallyrefuted all <strong>the</strong> arguments for <strong>the</strong> eternity of <strong>the</strong> world put <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r byAris<strong>to</strong>tle and Proclus (ca. d. 485). These s<strong>to</strong>ck proofs and refutationswere supplemented by numerous subtle refinements by Muslim andJewish philosophers over <strong>the</strong> centuries. One of <strong>the</strong> most importantaspects of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> as well as Jewish traditions is that whereasAris<strong>to</strong>tle had taken <strong>the</strong> world as his point of departure, Muslim andJewish philosophers often take God as <strong>the</strong>ir point of departure.These debates involved a large number of philosophers, whowere sometimes also scientists, but <strong>the</strong>re were no means available <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> test <strong>the</strong>ir arguments by experiments such as carbon dating;all <strong>the</strong>y had were philosophical <strong>to</strong>ols such as logic. In <strong>the</strong> courseof <strong>the</strong>se debates, a fur<strong>the</strong>r refinement of <strong>the</strong> argument led somephilosophers <strong>to</strong> postulate that matter was eternal, but <strong>the</strong> world inits present form was created in time. Thus, <strong>the</strong> entire debate can bedivided in<strong>to</strong> three categories: (i) arguments for <strong>the</strong> eternity of bothmatter and <strong>the</strong> world; (ii) arguments for <strong>the</strong> creation of both matterand <strong>the</strong> world; and (iii) arguments for <strong>the</strong> eternity of matter butcreation of <strong>the</strong> world.That it is impossible for generation <strong>to</strong> take place from nothingwas <strong>the</strong> foundation of Aris<strong>to</strong>tle’s argument, but those who opposedeternity attempted <strong>to</strong> show that it was a feeble foundation. Itsultimate counterargument rested on <strong>the</strong> point that what we observe<strong>to</strong>day <strong>to</strong> be a law of nature cannot be retrojectively assumed for atime hidden from us. Thus, <strong>the</strong> fact that we never observe a henexcept from an egg or an egg except from a hen cannot be extendedbeyond our observation <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> remote past. Many Kalam writers,such as Abd al-Jabbar (d. 1024) and al-Juwayni (d. 1085), refuted<strong>the</strong> eternity of <strong>the</strong> world on <strong>the</strong> basis of this argument, which hadalready been put forward by John Philoponus.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!