13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 • The Making of <strong>Islamic</strong> Scienceand has no his<strong>to</strong>rical agency but depends completely on who isusing it and <strong>to</strong> what ends. (Gutas 2003, 218)Gutas is not alone; battalions of latter-day postmodernists,secular his<strong>to</strong>rians of science, neo-Orientalists, and even sociologistswho have an aversion <strong>to</strong> religion hold <strong>the</strong> same view, under <strong>the</strong>influence of contemporary postmodernism. This comes in starkcontrast <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century Orientalists,who spent all <strong>the</strong>ir energies in constructing a homogeneous Islamin which an “orthodoxy” could be identified and posited against anopposing tradition of “free thinking.” Since <strong>the</strong> last decade of <strong>the</strong>twentieth century, and more so since <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> twentyfirstcentury, <strong>the</strong> various effects of postmodernism have been busyat deconstruction and <strong>the</strong> creation instead of a fluid Islam thathas nothing stable at any level. Thus, instead of <strong>the</strong> monolithic,homogenized, rarified, and static Islam of <strong>the</strong> Orientalists, we nowhave an Islam that can be fundamentally different across—andwithin—regions and eras. Needless <strong>to</strong> say, both extremes haveadded little clarity <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> conceptual categories so essential for realcommunication.Here we are brought <strong>to</strong> an interesting contradiction in muchof this thought: even though it is claimed <strong>the</strong>re is no “essentialIslam,” one can still safely speak of some “<strong>Islamic</strong>” phenomena—forexample, <strong>Islamic</strong> calligraphy and <strong>Islamic</strong> poetry. While <strong>the</strong> possibilityof an “<strong>Islamic</strong> science” is immediately denied, <strong>the</strong> “<strong>Islamic</strong> garden”and “<strong>Islamic</strong> architecture” do not undergo <strong>the</strong> same vehementreductionism. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, and even more interesting is that whiledenying Islam any essential nature, proponents of this thought createan essential science separate from any wider context or framework.Such accounts of <strong>the</strong> scientific activity in <strong>Islamic</strong> civilizationignore <strong>the</strong> QurāĀnic conception of nature outlined through verses,giving us a systematic and coherent view of <strong>the</strong> subject of scientificinvestigation—nature. Because of <strong>the</strong> antagonism <strong>to</strong>ward <strong>the</strong>foundational relationship between Islam and <strong>the</strong> scientific traditionthat was cultivated in <strong>Islamic</strong> civilization for eight hundred years,such accounts also fail <strong>to</strong> adequately explain <strong>the</strong> developmen<strong>to</strong>f those branches of science that were directly related <strong>to</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong>practices: astronomy used <strong>to</strong> determine <strong>the</strong> distance and direction

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!