13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Islam and Modern Science: Contemporary Issues • 203an attitude of care and preservation, and so on, without adding orsubtracting anything from <strong>the</strong> enterprise of modern science. WhatSardar and his associates failed <strong>to</strong> see was <strong>the</strong> foundations on which<strong>the</strong> modern enterprise of science emerged. Their discourse was moreconcerned with deconstructing myths, producing an awareness of <strong>the</strong>enormous differences between <strong>the</strong> status of Western scientists andthose working in <strong>the</strong> Muslim world, and vehemently rejecting certaintrends in <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>Islamic</strong> perspectives on science that werebecoming increasingly pronounced during <strong>the</strong> late 1970s and early1980s. Among <strong>the</strong>se was <strong>the</strong> phenomenon of “Bucaillism” alreadymentioned in <strong>the</strong> previous section. Although Sardar did not realize,he criticized <strong>the</strong>se trends as “dangerous” and traced <strong>the</strong>ir motif back<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> psychological need of some Muslims <strong>to</strong> prove that <strong>the</strong> QurāĀnis “scientific and modern.” He <strong>to</strong>ok a contemporary pamphlet byMuhammad Jamaluddin El-Fandy, On Cosmic Verses in <strong>the</strong> Quran, <strong>to</strong>be “one of <strong>the</strong> earliest” examples of such works, without realizingthat this apologetic literature was already <strong>the</strong> high point of Islam andscience discourse in <strong>the</strong> last two decades of <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century.Regardless of this his<strong>to</strong>rically inaccurate aspect, his criticism wasinstrumental in intensifying an internal critique of various positionswithin <strong>the</strong> Islam and science discourse.The Ijmalis position seemed important during its heyday but wassoon shown <strong>to</strong> lack solid roots for growth; its strongest advocates,who were mostly freelancers, did not make efforts <strong>to</strong> sustain <strong>the</strong>irdiscourse. All three champions of this position, Ziauddin Sardar,Pervez S. Manzoor, and Munawwar Anees, moved <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong>picsduring <strong>the</strong> 1990s.The result of inter-Muslim debates on <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>Islamic</strong> andnon-<strong>Islamic</strong> sciences was <strong>the</strong> maturity of <strong>the</strong> new discourse on Islamand science during <strong>the</strong> last quarter of <strong>the</strong> twentieth century. Thisprocess was helped by a number of international conferences andseminars held in various Muslim countries. Two of <strong>the</strong> most importantconferences of this nature were held in Pakistan in 1983 and 1995. Atsuch conferences, a whole range of perspectives on modern sciencecould be stated, debated, and thrashed about, with participantsreturning <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir countries with fresh insights. Through this process<strong>the</strong> new discourse sifted <strong>the</strong> important from <strong>the</strong> unimportant.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!