13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Islam, Transmission, and <strong>the</strong> Decline of <strong>Islamic</strong> Science • 151<strong>the</strong> fact that we do so as members of a civilization whose ma<strong>the</strong>maticaldevelopment depended importantly on <strong>the</strong> contributions of <strong>the</strong>medieval <strong>Islamic</strong> civilization” (Berggren 1996, 266). In such studies,judgments passed on <strong>the</strong> scientific achievements of a previouscivilization are invariably based on <strong>the</strong> developments in modernscience. This creates his<strong>to</strong>riographic problems and entails <strong>the</strong> dangerof unconsciously slipping from <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>rical fact in<strong>to</strong> a Whiggishview of his<strong>to</strong>ry, as if <strong>the</strong> final purpose of <strong>the</strong> cultivation of sciencein <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r civilization was merely <strong>to</strong> create modern science. “Thisapproach has had two quite opposite, but equally regrettable, results,”says Berggren:The first is a treatment of medieval Islam as a civilizationdeserving of attention only for its role as a channel throughwhich <strong>the</strong> great works of <strong>the</strong> Greeks were carried safely <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>eager minds of <strong>the</strong> European Renaissance. The emphasis fallson <strong>the</strong> two great periods of translations, that in<strong>to</strong> Arabic in <strong>the</strong>ninth century and that in<strong>to</strong> Latin in <strong>the</strong> twelfth and thirteenthcenturies, and <strong>the</strong> developments of <strong>the</strong> intervening centuriesprovide little more than a series of anecdotes about one curiousresult or ano<strong>the</strong>r that was proved by an occasional great figure.The second result of this Whiggish attitude is a selective andtendentious reading of medieval Arabic texts <strong>to</strong> show how<strong>Islamic</strong> science prefigured that of modern times…it wouldbe invidious <strong>to</strong> cite contemporary examples of ei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong>seapproaches—and of little interest <strong>to</strong> cite earlier examples—andI shall only observe that both of <strong>the</strong>se results, which on<strong>the</strong> surface seem <strong>to</strong> place such different values on <strong>Islamic</strong>civilization, should concur in valuing it only insofar as it servedends not its own; this is hardly surprising, since both aremotivated by a fundamental interest not in <strong>the</strong> past but in <strong>the</strong>present. (Berggren 1996, 266–67)There is yet ano<strong>the</strong>r perspective on <strong>the</strong> question of decline,again from within <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry of science. Here <strong>the</strong> approach is <strong>to</strong>examine <strong>the</strong> nature of science in <strong>Islamic</strong> civilization from within itsown framework and see where it could have gone. What possibilitieswere <strong>the</strong>re for different branches of science within <strong>the</strong> framework of<strong>the</strong>ir fields? Aydin Sayili appended a 24-page appendix <strong>to</strong> his The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!