13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Islam and Modern Science: Contemporary Issues • 209pierce <strong>to</strong> its depths <strong>the</strong> mystery of <strong>the</strong> things that contain—space,time, matter, energy—forgets <strong>the</strong> mystery of <strong>the</strong> things that arecontained: it tries <strong>to</strong> explain <strong>the</strong> quintessential properties of ourbodies and <strong>the</strong> intimate functioning of our souls, but it does not knowwhat intelligence and existence are; consequently, seeing what its“principles” are, it cannot be o<strong>the</strong>rwise than ignorant of what man is”(Schuon 1965, 111).The most representative voice of <strong>the</strong> traditionalist discourse onmodern science is that of Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Beginning with AnIntroduction <strong>to</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> Cosmological Doctrines (1964), Nasr’s scholarlywritings have explored various aspects of Islam’s relationship withscience over <strong>the</strong> last forty-two years. These works are part of acorpus of writings that addresses almost all aspects of Islam andits civilization—from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> concept of Ultimate Reality <strong>to</strong>sacred art and architecture. His works on science have explored<strong>the</strong> essential features of traditional sciences of nature as well asissues concerning modern science. Nasr’s unique position in <strong>the</strong>Islam and science discourse stems from his thorough training andunderstanding of modern Western science and traditional <strong>Islamic</strong>hikmah (Wisdom). Ironically, it was during his years at MIT andHarvard that he developed a deep yearning for what was not offeredat <strong>the</strong>se prestigious institutions—a Wisdom which could only belearned through an oral tradition. Therefore, soon after his return<strong>to</strong> his native Iran in 1958, he sought traditional masters so that hecould learn wisdom “at <strong>the</strong>ir feet” (Nasr 2001b, 41). By that time hehad already spent years studying Islam and Western philosophy andhad made contact with <strong>the</strong> great exposi<strong>to</strong>rs of traditional doctrinessuch as Schuon and Burckhardt. But it was <strong>the</strong> period between 1958and 1979 that proved <strong>to</strong> be <strong>the</strong> most important time for his writingson science. His training in <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry and philosophy of modernscience and <strong>the</strong> inner resources ga<strong>the</strong>red from traditional wisdomare a unique combination, making him <strong>the</strong> chief exposi<strong>to</strong>r of a clearand insightful <strong>Islamic</strong> perspective on science. His critique of modernscience identifies five main traits of modern science, as Kalin hassummed up his position: (i) <strong>the</strong> secular view of <strong>the</strong> universe thatsees no traces of <strong>the</strong> Divine in <strong>the</strong> natural order; (ii) mechanizationof <strong>the</strong> world-picture upon <strong>the</strong> model of machines and clocks; (iii)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!