13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Islam and Modern Science: Contemporary Issues • 213The denial of <strong>the</strong> reality and existence of God is alreadyimplied in this philosophy. Its methods are chiefly philosophicrationalism… rationalism, both <strong>the</strong> philosophic and <strong>the</strong> secularkind, and empiricism tends <strong>to</strong> deny authority and intuition aslegitimate sources and methods of knowledge. Not that <strong>the</strong>ydeny <strong>the</strong> existence of authority and of intuition, but that <strong>the</strong>yreduce authority and intuition <strong>to</strong> reason and experience. (al-Attas 1989, 6)The denial or reduction of “<strong>the</strong> reality and existence of God”is recognized by a large number of Muslim scholars <strong>to</strong> be <strong>the</strong> mainproblem as far as Islam and modern science are concerned. It is notthat individual scientists practicing modern science are conceived asnot having faith in God; ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> issue here is <strong>the</strong> foundationalstructure of modern science, which leaves out <strong>the</strong> Crea<strong>to</strong>r. All o<strong>the</strong>rissues are seen as following this one initial divergence.Islam and <strong>the</strong> Brave New World of BiogeneticsPerhaps nothing makes <strong>the</strong> need for a thorough, comprehensive,and creative interaction between religions and modern science asapparent and urgent as certain recent developments in biogeneticsand reproductive technologies. After all, we can now have a childcome in<strong>to</strong> this world from <strong>the</strong> womb of a mo<strong>the</strong>r where <strong>the</strong> wouldbebaby was implanted as an embryo created from <strong>the</strong> ova of adonor (paid <strong>to</strong> produce a number of ova following <strong>the</strong> use of hyperovulationmedication) and sperm obtained from a sperm bank. Themo<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> baby in this actual case was, however, only providinggestational services <strong>to</strong> a couple who could not have children formedical reasons. Who would be considered <strong>the</strong> child’s real parents?What rights would <strong>the</strong> donor have over <strong>the</strong> child? What if one day<strong>the</strong> donor of <strong>the</strong> sperm claimed his rights over <strong>the</strong> child? Whatwould this child inherit? From whom? What if <strong>the</strong> couple who hadpaid for <strong>the</strong> services of <strong>the</strong> surrogate mo<strong>the</strong>r and all o<strong>the</strong>r expensesdivorced after <strong>the</strong> child was born—who would have legal rights over<strong>the</strong> child? What if both of <strong>the</strong>m wanted <strong>to</strong> keep <strong>the</strong> child? Whatif nei<strong>the</strong>r wanted <strong>the</strong> child anymore? What if <strong>the</strong> sperm donorsuddenly changed his mind and decided that <strong>the</strong> use of his sperm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!