13.07.2015 Views

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

Eighth to the Sixteenth Century - Rashid Islamic Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 • The Making of <strong>Islamic</strong> Scienceby his successors. In this chapter we only discuss cosmological origins;<strong>the</strong> question of biological origins is discussed in Chapter 7.Since in this chapter we only explore <strong>the</strong> nexus between Islamand science during <strong>the</strong> eighth <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> sixteenth centuries, <strong>the</strong> thirdset of issues is irrelevant here, for <strong>the</strong>se technologies did not existduring that time. We will, however, discuss <strong>the</strong>se while dealing with<strong>the</strong> relationship between Islam and modern science.S<strong>to</strong>rm in a Cup of Tea: Islam Against Science or Islam forScience?As far as science is concerned, Islam is definitely a hurdle in itspropagation; it can be said that <strong>the</strong>re is something inherently wrongwith Islam that does not allow science <strong>to</strong> flourish. This is why, inspite of <strong>the</strong> enormous oil wealth available in <strong>the</strong> Middle East, noMuslim country is producing science <strong>to</strong>day. His<strong>to</strong>rically speaking, itis true that a large part of Greek scientific texts was translated in<strong>to</strong>Arabic and made available <strong>to</strong> Muslims, but even this did not produceany original science, and certainly not <strong>the</strong> kind that emerged inEurope at <strong>the</strong> time of Scientific Revolution. It appears that Greekscience survived in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> civilization not because of Islam,but despite it. Treated as “foreign sciences,” <strong>the</strong> Greek heritage wasalways looked upon by Muslim religious authorities with suspicionand hostility and as soon as <strong>the</strong>y could, <strong>the</strong>y destroyed it. Al-Ghazali(d. 1111) was <strong>the</strong> man most responsible for this. Despite this, a fewbrilliant philosopher-scientists and physicians need <strong>to</strong> be mentioned,for, in spite of vigorous opposition, <strong>the</strong>y left behind a small body ofwork—mainly commentaries on Aris<strong>to</strong>tle’s natural philosophy—thathad a significant impact on Western thought when it was translatedin<strong>to</strong> Latin. Among <strong>the</strong>se philosopher-scientists, al-Kindi, al-Farabi (d.ca. 950), Ibn Sina, Ibn Bajja (d. 1139), and Ibn Rushd are noteworthy.This is how a very large number of general books on science andreligion, as well as those dealing with <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry of science, depict<strong>the</strong> eight hundred years of scientific activity in <strong>Islamic</strong> civilization.Most accounts actually reduce this time period <strong>to</strong> half its length bya summary death sentence, which turns this tradition <strong>to</strong> an inertmass some time in <strong>the</strong> twelfth century. This is <strong>the</strong> prevalent view of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!