05.04.2016 Views

A History of English Language

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Middle english 185<br />

phonology and morphology down to the early fourteenth century. M.K.Pope’s From Latin to<br />

Modern French with Especial Consideration <strong>of</strong> Anglo-Norman (2nd ed., Manchester, 1952)<br />

contains a chapter on the special developments in England. Skeat’s two lists in the Trans. <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Philological Soc., 1880–1881 and 1888–1890, <strong>of</strong>fer a convenient collection <strong>of</strong> French words<br />

used in England.<br />

The loss <strong>of</strong> native words is treated in a series <strong>of</strong> monographs, such as Emil Hemken, Das<br />

Aussterben alter Substantiva im Verlaufe der englischen Sprachgeschichte (Kiel, Germany,<br />

1906). Similar treatments are those <strong>of</strong> Oberdörffer on the adjective (Kiel, 1908), Offe on the<br />

verb (Kiel, 1908), Rotzoll on diminutives (Heidelberg, 1909), and the more general dissertations<br />

<strong>of</strong> Fr.Teichert, Über das Aussterben alter Wörter im Verlaufe der englischen Sprachgeschichte<br />

(Kiel, 1912), and Kurt Jaeschke, Beiträge zur Frage des Wortschwundes im Englischen<br />

(Breslau, 1931); and Xavier Dekeyser and Luc Pauwels, “The Demise <strong>of</strong> the Old <strong>English</strong><br />

Heritage and Lexical Innovation in Middle <strong>English</strong>,” Leuvense Bijdragen, 79 (1990), 1–23. The<br />

curtailment <strong>of</strong> prefix and suffix derivatives can be seen in such studies as T.P.Harrison, The<br />

Separable Prefixes in Anglo-Saxon (Baltimore, MD, 1892), and the studies <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

prefixes in Old <strong>English</strong> such as bi by Lenze (Kiel, 1909), for(e) by Siemerling (Kiel, 1909),<br />

on(d) by Lüngen (Kiel, 1911), wið(er) by Hohenstein (Kiel, 1912), and <strong>of</strong>er by Röhling<br />

(Heidelberg, 1914). Full titles <strong>of</strong> all these works can be found in Kennedy’s Bibliography.<br />

The Latin borrowings in Middle <strong>English</strong> and the affectation <strong>of</strong> aureate terms are treated in the<br />

works <strong>of</strong> Dellit and Mendenhall mentioned in the footnotes to § 142 and § 143. The important<br />

references for the influence <strong>of</strong> the Low Countries are given in the footnote to § 145.<br />

The major study <strong>of</strong> Middle <strong>English</strong> dialects is by Angus Mclntosh, M.L.Samuels, and Michael<br />

Benskin with the assistance <strong>of</strong> Margaret Laing and Keith Williamson, A Linguistic Atlas <strong>of</strong> Late<br />

Mediaeval <strong>English</strong> (4 vols., Aberdeen, 1986). During the preparation <strong>of</strong> the Atlas several<br />

important essays on the principles <strong>of</strong> Middle <strong>English</strong> dialectology were published by Mclntosh<br />

and by Samuels and have been reprinted in Middle <strong>English</strong> Dialectology: Essays on Some<br />

Principles and Problems, ed. Margaret Laing (Aberdeen, 1989). There are individual studies <strong>of</strong><br />

particular dialect features and dialect areas, including the works <strong>of</strong> Wyld, Ekwall, Serjeantson,<br />

and others. A more extensive monograph is Gillis Kristensson, A Survey <strong>of</strong> Middle <strong>English</strong><br />

Dialects 1290–1350: The Six Northern Counties and Lincolnshire (Lund, Sweden, 1967; Lund<br />

Stud. in <strong>English</strong>, vol. 35), with a useful bibliography covering the whole <strong>of</strong> England. On<br />

Chaucer’s <strong>English</strong>, see David Burnley, The <strong>Language</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chaucer (London, 1983); Arthur<br />

O.Sandved, Introduction to Chaucerian <strong>English</strong> (Cambridge, UK, 1985), and Christopher<br />

Cannon, The Making <strong>of</strong> Chaucer’s <strong>English</strong>: A Study <strong>of</strong> Words (Cambridge, UK, 1998).<br />

Structural changes in the verb phrase during Chaucer’s period are examined by Ans van<br />

Kemenade, Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> (Dordrecht,<br />

Netherlands, 1987) and by Elly van Gelderen, The Rise <strong>of</strong> Functional Categories (Amsterdam,<br />

1993). A good overview <strong>of</strong> Middle <strong>English</strong> syntax is Olga Fischer’s chapter, “Syntax,” in The<br />

Cambridge <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>English</strong> <strong>Language</strong>, Volume II: 1066–1476, ed. Norman Blake<br />

(Cambridge, UK, 1992), pp. 207−408.<br />

On the rise <strong>of</strong> Standard <strong>English</strong> the fundamental work is L.Morsbach, Ueber den Ursprung der<br />

neuenglischen Schriftsprache (Heilbronn, Germany, 1888), which may be supplemented by<br />

H.M.Flasdieck, Forschungen zur Frülhzeit der neuenglischen Schriftsprache (2 parts, Halle,<br />

Germany, 1922). Contributing elements are discussed by R.E.Zachrisson, “Notes on the Essex<br />

Dialect and the Origin <strong>of</strong> Vulgar London Speech,” Englische Studien, 59 (1925), 346–60; Agnes<br />

Peitz, Der Einfluss des nördlichen Dialektes im Mittelenglischen auf die entstehende<br />

Hochsprache (Bonn, 1933); and H.C.Wyld, “South-Eastern and South-East Midland Dialects in<br />

Middle <strong>English</strong>,” Essays and Studies, 6 (1920), 112–45. The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the London<br />

dialect are treated by B.A.Mackenzie, The Early London Dialect (Oxford, 1928), to which may<br />

be added two articles by P.H.Reaney, “On Certain Phonological Features <strong>of</strong> the Dialect <strong>of</strong><br />

London in the Twelfth Century,” Englische Studien, 59 (1925), 321–45, and “The Dialect <strong>of</strong><br />

London in the Thirteenth Century,” ibid., 61 (1926), 9–23. A later period is treated in Hans

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!