05.04.2016 Views

A History of English Language

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The renaissance, 1500-1650 233<br />

185. General Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the Period.<br />

As we survey the period <strong>of</strong> the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries—the period <strong>of</strong><br />

early Modern <strong>English</strong>—we recognize certain general characteristics, some <strong>of</strong> which are<br />

exemplified in the foregoing discussion, while others concern the larger spirit <strong>of</strong> the age<br />

in linguistic matters. These may be stated in the form <strong>of</strong> a brief summary as a conclusion<br />

to the present chapter.<br />

First, a conscious interest in the <strong>English</strong> language and an attention to its problems are<br />

now widely manifested. The fifteenth century had witnessed sporadic attempts by<br />

individual writers to embellish their style with “aureate terms.” These attempts show in a<br />

way a desire to improve the language, at least along certain limited lines. But in the<br />

sixteenth century we meet with a considerable body <strong>of</strong> literature—books and pamphlets,<br />

prefaces and incidental observations—defending the language against those who were<br />

disposed to compare it unfavorably to Latin or other modern tongues, patriotically<br />

recognizing its position as the national speech, and urging its fitness for learned and<br />

literary use. At the same time it is considered worthy <strong>of</strong> cultivation, and to be looked after<br />

in the education <strong>of</strong> the young. Whereas a century or two before, the upper classes seemed<br />

more interested in having their children acquire a correct French accent and sometimes<br />

sent them abroad for the purpose, we now find Elyot urging that noblemen’s sons should<br />

be brought up by those who “speke none englisshe but that which is cleane, polite,<br />

perfectly and articulately pronounced, omittinge no lettre or sillable,” and observing that<br />

he knew some children <strong>of</strong> noble birth who had “attained corrupte and foule<br />

pronunciation” 56 through the lack <strong>of</strong> such precautions. Numerous books attempt to<br />

describe the proper pronunciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong>, sometimes for foreigners but <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

presumably for those whose native dialect did not conform to the standard <strong>of</strong> London and<br />

the court. Along with this regard for <strong>English</strong> as an object <strong>of</strong> pride and cultivation went<br />

the desire to improve it in various ways—particularly to enlarge its vocabulary and to<br />

regulate its spelling. All <strong>of</strong> these efforts point clearly to a new attitude toward <strong>English</strong>, an<br />

attitude that makes it an object <strong>of</strong> conscious and in many ways fruitful consideration.<br />

In the second place, we attain in this period to something in the nature <strong>of</strong> a standard,<br />

something moreover that is recognizably “modern.” The effect <strong>of</strong> the Great Vowel Shift<br />

was to bring the pronunciation within measurable distance <strong>of</strong> that which prevails today.<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> the printing press and the efforts <strong>of</strong> spelling reformers had resulted in a<br />

form <strong>of</strong> written <strong>English</strong> that<br />

56<br />

The Governour, chap. 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!