05.04.2016 Views

A History of English Language

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A history <strong>of</strong> the english language 356<br />

THE DIALECTS OF AMERICAN<br />

ENGLISH<br />

Southern and carving out a third major dialect, straddling the traditional boundary and<br />

extending from the Middle Atlantic area to the Mississippi and beyond. This area was<br />

divided into North Midland, which comprised most <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania and the central areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Great Lakes states; and South Midland, which continued to be referred to as the<br />

Upper South or the Southern Uplands, and which included the southern Appalachians, the<br />

Ozarks <strong>of</strong> Missouri and Arkansas, and parts <strong>of</strong> Oklahoma and Texas. Subsequent studies<br />

have supported or modified particular isoglosses and dialect boundaries, the results<br />

varying from study to study with the phonological and lexical criteria used. The main<br />

point <strong>of</strong> controversy has been whether the selection and weighting <strong>of</strong> isoglosses supports<br />

a distinct Midland dialect. Although Kurath’s tripartite division was widely accepted for<br />

forty years, recent investigations have led some dialectologists to reemphasize a primary<br />

North-South linguistic boundary. Craig M.Carver, for example, proposes Upper South for<br />

South Midland and Lower North for North Midland. 28 Ellen Johnson, while supportive <strong>of</strong><br />

Kurath’s Midland, prefers the term Appalachian for that dialect, and for Kurath’s South<br />

the term Deep South. 29 These and other differences among dialectologists are partly<br />

matters <strong>of</strong> nomenclature, though not merely that, because it is nomenclature linked to<br />

culture and history; the differences also result from the indeterminacy <strong>of</strong> the concept<br />

dialect itself. Unlike state and county boundaries, which can be found demarcated on the<br />

land, dialect boundaries are abstractions <strong>of</strong> linguists, artifices that are built on empirical<br />

28<br />

American Regional Dialects, p. 181.<br />

29<br />

“Yet Again: The Midland Dialect,” American Speech, 69 (1994), 419–30.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!