05.04.2016 Views

A History of English Language

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A history <strong>of</strong> the english language 242<br />

As pointed out in the preceding section, one <strong>of</strong> the chief defects <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> that people<br />

became acutely conscious <strong>of</strong> in the latter part <strong>of</strong> the seventeenth century was the absence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a standard, the fact that the language had not been reduced to a rule so that one could<br />

express oneself at least with the assurance <strong>of</strong> doing so correctly. Dryden sums up this<br />

attitude in words: “we have yet no prosodia, not so much as a tolerable dictionary, or a<br />

grammar, so that our language is in a manner barbarous.” 3 That is, the language did not<br />

possess the character <strong>of</strong> an orderly and well-regulated society. One must write it<br />

according to one’s individual judgment and therefore without the confidence that one<br />

might feel if there were rules on which to lean and a vocabulary sanctioned by some<br />

recognized authority. It was a conviction <strong>of</strong> long standing with him. In his dedication <strong>of</strong><br />

Troilus and Cressida to the earl <strong>of</strong> Sunderland (1679) he says: “how barbarously we yet<br />

write and speak, your lordship knows, and I am sufficiently sensible in my own <strong>English</strong>.<br />

For I am <strong>of</strong>ten put to a stand, in considering whether what I write be the idiom <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tongue, or false grammar.” And he adds: “I am desirous, if it were possible, that we might<br />

all write with the same certainty <strong>of</strong> words, and purity <strong>of</strong> phrase, to which the Italians first<br />

arrived, and after them the French; at least that we might advance so far, as our tongue is<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> such a standard.” The ideal was expressed many times in the earlier part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

eighteenth century, perhaps nowhere more accurately than in the words “we write by<br />

guess, more than any stated rule, and form every man his diction, either according to his<br />

humour and caprice, or in pursuance <strong>of</strong> a blind and servile imitation.” 4<br />

In the eighteenth century the need for standardization and regulation was summed up<br />

in the word ascertainment. The force <strong>of</strong> this word then was some-what different from that<br />

which it has today. To ascertain was not so much to<br />

3<br />

Discourse concerning Satire (1693).<br />

4<br />

Thomas Stackhouse, Reflections on the Nature and Property <strong>of</strong><strong>Language</strong> in General, on the<br />

Advantages, Defects, andManner <strong>of</strong>lmproving the <strong>English</strong> Tongue in Particular (1731), p. 187.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!