05.04.2016 Views

A History of English Language

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A history <strong>of</strong> the english language 208<br />

Ben Jonson delivered a purge to Marston in the Poetaster (1601), relieving him <strong>of</strong><br />

retrograde, reciprocal, incubus, lubrical, defunct, magnificate, spurious, inflate,<br />

turgidous, ventosity, strenuous, obstupefact, and a number <strong>of</strong> similar words. The attitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> most people seems to have been one <strong>of</strong> compromise. No Elizabethan could avoid<br />

wholly the use <strong>of</strong> the new words. Writers differed chiefly in the extent to which they<br />

allied themselves with the movement or resisted the tendency. As is so <strong>of</strong>ten the case, the<br />

safest course was a middle one, to borrow, but “without too manifest insolence and too<br />

wanton affectation.”<br />

161. Permanent Additions.<br />

From the exaggeration <strong>of</strong> a critic like Wilson one might get the impression that much <strong>of</strong><br />

the effort to introduce new words into the language was pedantic and ill-advised. Some <strong>of</strong><br />

the words Wilson ridicules seem forced and in individual cases were certainly<br />

unnecessary. But it would be a mistake to conclude that all or even a large part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

additions were <strong>of</strong> this sort. Indeed the surprising thing about the movement here<br />

described is the number <strong>of</strong> words that we owe to this period and that seem now to be<br />

indispensable. Many <strong>of</strong> them are in such common use today that it is hard for us to realize<br />

that to the Elizabethan they were so strange and difficult as to be a subject <strong>of</strong> controversy.<br />

When Elyot wished to describe a democracy he said, “This manner <strong>of</strong> governaunce was<br />

called in Greke democratia, in Latine popularis potentia, in Englisshe the rule <strong>of</strong> the<br />

comminaltie.” If he were not to have to refer to “the rule <strong>of</strong> the commonalty” by this<br />

roundabout phrase, he could hardly do better than to try to naturalize the Greek word.<br />

Again he felt the need <strong>of</strong> a single word for “all maner <strong>of</strong> lerning, which <strong>of</strong> some is called<br />

the world <strong>of</strong> science, <strong>of</strong> other the circle <strong>of</strong> doctrine, which is in one word <strong>of</strong> Greke,<br />

encyclopedia” Though purists might object, the word encydopedia filled a need in<br />

<strong>English</strong>, and it has lived on. The words that were introduced at this time were <strong>of</strong>ten basic<br />

words—nouns, adjectives, verbs. Among nouns we may note as random examples<br />

allurement, allusion,<br />

29<br />

In Strange Newes, or Four Letters Confuted (1592).<br />

30<br />

Pierce’s Supererogation (1593).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!