05.04.2016 Views

A History of English Language

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A history <strong>of</strong> the english language 224<br />

It will be noticed that the Great Vowel Shift is responsible for the unorthodox use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

vowel symbols in <strong>English</strong> spelling. The spelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> had become fixed in a general<br />

way before the shift and therefore did not change when the quality <strong>of</strong> the long vowels<br />

changed. Consequently our vowel symbols no longer correspond to the sounds they once<br />

represented in <strong>English</strong> and still represent in the other modern languages. 44<br />

178. Weakening <strong>of</strong> Unaccented Vowels.<br />

A little observation and reflection shows us that in unaccented syllables, too, the spelling<br />

does not accurately represent the pronunciation today. This is because in all periods <strong>of</strong><br />

the language the vowels <strong>of</strong> unstressed syllables have had a tendency to weaken and then<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten to disappear. This is true <strong>of</strong> all parts <strong>of</strong> a word. For example, we do not distinguish<br />

in ordinary or rapid speech between the vowels at the beginning <strong>of</strong> ago, upon, opinion.<br />

The sound in all three words is [ə]; in other cases it is commonly [ə], or [I]. Consider the<br />

unstressed middle or final syllable in the words introduce, elegant [ə, I], drama, color,<br />

kingdom, breakfast (brεkfəst or brεkf’st), Monday [i]. The weakening is especially<br />

noticeable in words from French where an accented vowel came to be unaccented in<br />

<strong>English</strong> (cf. French mouton, raisin, bonté with <strong>English</strong> mutton, raisin, bounty). One must<br />

not be misled by the spelling. The original spelling was generally retained and in recent<br />

times has occasionally influenced the pronunciation so that the quality <strong>of</strong> the vowel has<br />

been restored to something like its earlier character. Window now has a fairly welldefined<br />

diphthong in the final syllable [oU] or [o u ], but the weakened vowel is evident in<br />

the dialectal pronunciation winder. Misguided purists <strong>of</strong>ten try to pronounce the final<br />

syllable <strong>of</strong> Monday, with the full quality <strong>of</strong> the diphthong in day. But even when the<br />

vowel has been restored in standard speech the weakened form is generally apparent in<br />

informal speech and in the dialects.<br />

179. Grammatical Features.<br />

<strong>English</strong> grammar in the sixteenth and early seventeenth century is marked more by the<br />

survival <strong>of</strong> certain forms and usages that have since disappeared than by any fundamental<br />

developments. The great changes that reduced the inflections <strong>of</strong> Old <strong>English</strong> to their<br />

modern proportions had already taken place. In the few parts <strong>of</strong> speech that retain some<br />

<strong>of</strong> their original inflections, the reader <strong>of</strong> Shakespeare or the Authorized Version is<br />

conscious <strong>of</strong> minor differences <strong>of</strong> form and in the framing <strong>of</strong> sentences may note<br />

differences <strong>of</strong> syntax and idiom that, although they attract attention, are not sufficient to<br />

interfere seriously with understanding. The more important <strong>of</strong> these differences we may<br />

pass briefly in review.<br />

44<br />

A comprehensive history <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> spelling has yet to be written. The fullest survey is<br />

by D.G.Scragg, A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> Spelling (New York, 1974). For a brief treatment<br />

the reader may consult W.W.Skeat, Principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> Etymology, First Series (2nd<br />

ed., Oxford, 1892). chap. 16. A clear statement <strong>of</strong> modern usage is given in W.A.Craigie,<br />

<strong>English</strong> Spelling: Its Rules and Reasons (New York, 1927).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!