05.04.2016 Views

A History of English Language

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The nineteenth century and after 315<br />

in the process <strong>of</strong> learning a language. Typically the standard features near the basilectal<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the implicational scale are learned first, and those near the acrolectal end are<br />

learned later if at all. The study <strong>of</strong> language acquisition leads finally to a convergence in<br />

the concerns <strong>of</strong> creolists and generative grammarians (see § 255). In what Noam<br />

Chomsky has called “Plato’s problem,” generative grammarians have aimed to explain<br />

how language can be acquired at all, given the poverty <strong>of</strong> the stimulus. 45 “How can we<br />

know so much on the basis <strong>of</strong> so little experience?” they ask. Their answer is that a<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> linguistic universals is part <strong>of</strong> the innate structure <strong>of</strong> the human brain.<br />

Similarly, on the basis <strong>of</strong> evidence such as we have seen, Derek Bickerton has developed<br />

a theory <strong>of</strong> a “bioprogram” for the acquisition <strong>of</strong> language. 46 Although these theories<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten differ on the details <strong>of</strong> their specific analysis, as indeed all theories do, they both<br />

see the study <strong>of</strong> language as ultimately rooted in the biology <strong>of</strong> the speaking animal.<br />

231. Spelling Reform.<br />

In the latter part <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century renewed interest was manifested in the problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> spelling, and the question <strong>of</strong> reform was vigorously agitated. For nearly 400<br />

years the <strong>English</strong> have struggled with their spelling. It was one <strong>of</strong> the chief problems that<br />

seemed to confront the language in the time <strong>of</strong> Shakespeare (see pages 208–14), and it<br />

continued to be an issue throughout the seventeenth and to some extent in the eighteenth<br />

century. The publication in 1837 <strong>of</strong> a system <strong>of</strong> shorthand by Isaac Pitman led to his<br />

proposal <strong>of</strong> several plans <strong>of</strong> phonetic spelling for general use. In these schemes Pitman<br />

was assisted by Alexander J.Ellis, a much greater scholar. They were promoted during<br />

the 1840s by the publication <strong>of</strong> a periodical called the Phonotypic Journal, later changed<br />

to the Phonetic Journal. The Bible and numerous classic works were printed in the new<br />

spelling, and the movement aroused considerable public interest. By 1870 the <strong>English</strong><br />

Philological Society had taken up the question, and the Transactions contain numerous<br />

discussions <strong>of</strong> it. Prominent members who took part in the debate included Ellis, Morris,<br />

Payne, Sweet, Furnivall, Skeat, and Murray. The discussion spread into the columns <strong>of</strong><br />

the Academy and the Athenaeum. America became interested in the question, and in 1883<br />

the American Philological Association recommended the adoption <strong>of</strong> a long list <strong>of</strong> new<br />

spellings approved jointly by it and the <strong>English</strong> society. Spelling Reform Associations<br />

were formed in both countries. In America men like March, Lounsbury, Grandgent,<br />

William Dean Howells, and Brander Matthews lent their support to the movement. In<br />

1898 the National Education<br />

45<br />

Among many writings by Chomsky on this subject, see Knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>Language</strong>: Its Nature,<br />

Origin, and Use (New York, 1986).<br />

46<br />

<strong>Language</strong> and Species (Chicago, 1990).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!