10.01.2017 Views

Forging new pathways of research and innovation in open and distance learning

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Forg<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>new</strong> <strong>pathways</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>novation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>open</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>distance</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Reach<strong>in</strong>g from the roots<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the 9 th European Distance <strong>and</strong> E-Learn<strong>in</strong>g Network Research Workshop, 2016<br />

Oldenburg, 4-6 October, 2016<br />

ISBN 978-615-5511-12-7<br />

INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE<br />

‘ONLINE LEARNER PROFILING QUESTIONNAIRE’<br />

IN GENERATING A PROFILE OF LEARNERS BASED ON LEARNER<br />

DISPOSITIONS: A PILOT STUDY<br />

Pengiran Shaiffadzillah Pengiran Omarali, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester, United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

Summary<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is to pilot a <strong>new</strong>ly constructed Onl<strong>in</strong>e Learner Pr<strong>of</strong>il<strong>in</strong>g<br />

questionnaire (OLP) to address issues <strong>of</strong> reliability, coll<strong>in</strong>earity <strong>and</strong> redundancy <strong>and</strong> to trial its<br />

capacity to generate reliable statistical data. The OLP was adm<strong>in</strong>istered to a sample <strong>of</strong> Brunei<br />

students <strong>in</strong> the UK <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> Brunei to measure their dispositions toward onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g based<br />

on the various capital <strong>and</strong> disposition types drawn from Bourdieu’s Theory <strong>of</strong> Practice as<br />

placeholder dimensions. The end objective is to identify key dispositions represent<strong>in</strong>g these<br />

dimensions <strong>in</strong> order to effectively perform factor analysis. Through correlation tests <strong>and</strong><br />

factor analysis, the study identified 6 to 8 discernible factors based on key dispositions which<br />

<strong>in</strong> turn were correlated aga<strong>in</strong>st key capital that can be <strong>in</strong>ferred as <strong>in</strong>fluential to the<br />

manifestations <strong>of</strong> these dispositions. These key capitals <strong>and</strong> dispositions create different<br />

configurations, or Bourdieu’s concept <strong>of</strong> habitus, <strong>and</strong> these habitus is the eventual identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mechanism for the actual study that will <strong>in</strong>corporate the f<strong>in</strong>alized version <strong>of</strong> the OLP<br />

questionnaire.<br />

Introduction<br />

In a previous pre-pilot study (Omarali, 2015), it was concluded that the early version <strong>of</strong> the<br />

OLP (henceforth OLP V.1) was not analytically robust to generate discernible groups <strong>of</strong><br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e learners, ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to (a) the use <strong>of</strong> a conceptual framework that was guided by a<br />

synthetic amalgamation <strong>of</strong> several learn<strong>in</strong>g theories, <strong>and</strong> (b) the effect <strong>of</strong> a small sample size<br />

on the analytical methods performed. This pilot study builds over the flaws <strong>of</strong> the pre-piloted<br />

OLP V.1 via the process <strong>of</strong> ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g items <strong>in</strong>formed by a less arbitrary framework, yet still<br />

reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the ma<strong>in</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g learners’ dispositions towards onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

This study has identified Bourdieu’s Theory <strong>of</strong> Practice (1977) as the best fit <strong>and</strong> most<br />

overarch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> organiz<strong>in</strong>g the items from OLP V.1 because upon attempts to analyze the<br />

generated data it was found that the use <strong>of</strong> several theories, though established as competently<br />

reliable <strong>in</strong> their respective accord, caused disarray when comb<strong>in</strong>ed together. In addition,<br />

Bourdieu’s more judicious explanation <strong>of</strong> dispositions <strong>and</strong> their <strong>in</strong>terplay were found to be<br />

more design practical <strong>and</strong> content relevant, particularly <strong>in</strong> ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, omitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> add<strong>in</strong>g items<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!