10.01.2017 Views

Forging new pathways of research and innovation in open and distance learning

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Onl<strong>in</strong>e Learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Community Colleges <strong>of</strong> the State University <strong>of</strong> New York:<br />

Initial Results on Differences between Classroom-Only <strong>and</strong> Onl<strong>in</strong>e Learners<br />

Peter Shea, Temi Bidjerano<br />

with higher academic ability (not need<strong>in</strong>g remedial coursework) <strong>and</strong> higher socio-economic<br />

status. In addition, pr<strong>of</strong>essional coursework credits <strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> credits <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Humanities had a positive effect on student classroom GPA, possibly reflect<strong>in</strong>g grade <strong>in</strong>flation<br />

<strong>in</strong> these discipl<strong>in</strong>es. However, these same conventional factors did not appear to fully expla<strong>in</strong><br />

the difference between classroom <strong>and</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e GPA. Our data suggest that net <strong>of</strong> other factors,<br />

academic ability, the number <strong>of</strong> STEM credits attempted, <strong>and</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e course load represent the<br />

most reliable predictors <strong>of</strong> the difference between GPAs. The gap grows bigger for students<br />

who qualified for remedial coursework <strong>in</strong> their first semester <strong>in</strong> college <strong>and</strong> for those with<br />

more credits <strong>in</strong> the STEM discipl<strong>in</strong>es. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, onl<strong>in</strong>e course load is not only positively<br />

correlated with classroom GPA but it also dim<strong>in</strong>ishes the discrepancy between classroom <strong>and</strong><br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e GPA. The same was not true for the effect <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ority status; the mean classroom GPA<br />

<strong>of</strong> Caucasian students tended to be higher than the mean classroom GPA <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ority<br />

students, but m<strong>in</strong>ority status had no effect on the gap between onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> classroom GPA.<br />

Nevertheless, <strong>in</strong> all models, the size <strong>and</strong> the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the difference <strong>in</strong> GPAs reveal that<br />

there is a great deal <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tra-<strong>in</strong>dividual variability <strong>in</strong> the change from classroom to onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

GPA. This suggests that other with<strong>in</strong>-person characteristics (not captured by the models<br />

evaluated <strong>in</strong> this study) might be contribut<strong>in</strong>g to trends.<br />

Additional analysis on <strong>research</strong> question 3 <strong>in</strong>dicated that with the exception <strong>of</strong> the first <strong>and</strong><br />

the last semester, students with comb<strong>in</strong>ed coursework were significantly more likely to atta<strong>in</strong><br />

a degree at a later po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> time (p < .001). Of the 4,914 students who had both onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong><br />

classroom courses <strong>in</strong> Spr<strong>in</strong>g 13, 31% were able to graduate <strong>in</strong> a subsequent semester. The<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> degree completers are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The odds <strong>of</strong> degree atta<strong>in</strong>ment were<br />

about 1.5 times higher for students with a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> traditional courses<br />

compared to students with classroom courses only. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, the odds <strong>of</strong> degree<br />

atta<strong>in</strong>ment were about 2 to 3 times lower for the fully onl<strong>in</strong>e students relative to students with<br />

a mix <strong>of</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> classroom courses.<br />

Significance <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g a large sample from a unified community college system, <strong>in</strong> four <strong>of</strong> the seven semesters<br />

analyzed we found slightly lower GPAs for students <strong>in</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e courses than for these same<br />

students tak<strong>in</strong>g classroom courses. These outcomes are <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g for several reasons. First, it<br />

is clear that participation <strong>in</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e coursework is a cause for at least some concern for<br />

subgroups <strong>of</strong> students <strong>in</strong> these community colleges. In general, students’ GPAs were slightly<br />

lower <strong>in</strong> their onl<strong>in</strong>e coursework than <strong>in</strong> their classroom coursework <strong>in</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

semesters analyzed. These differences were quite small overall. However, students who needed<br />

remedial coursework were particularly ill-suited to onl<strong>in</strong>e study <strong>and</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g STEM courses<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e appears to <strong>in</strong>crease the small gaps <strong>in</strong> GPA between onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> classroom conditions.<br />

Second, that for three <strong>of</strong> the seven semesters there were no significant differences <strong>in</strong> GPA<br />

between onl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> classroom courses represents an alternate <strong>and</strong> potentially more positive<br />

72 Reach<strong>in</strong>g from the roots – 9 th EDEN Research Workshop Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, 2016, Oldenburg<br />

ISBN 978-615-5511-12-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!