Forging new pathways of research and innovation in open and distance learning
RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings
RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Forg<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>new</strong> <strong>pathways</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>novation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>open</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>distance</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
Reach<strong>in</strong>g from the roots<br />
Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the 9 th European Distance <strong>and</strong> E-Learn<strong>in</strong>g Network Research Workshop, 2016<br />
Oldenburg, 4-6 October, 2016<br />
ISBN 978-615-5511-12-7<br />
OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES (OER):<br />
GUIDANCE FOR INSTITUTIONAL DECISION MAKERS IN<br />
DEVELOPING AN OER STRATEGY<br />
Lisa Marie Blaschke, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany<br />
Summary<br />
In the hope <strong>of</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g ever-ris<strong>in</strong>g educational costs, more universities are turn<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>open</strong><br />
educational resources (OER) as a means <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>ancial burden on students.<br />
Although <strong>in</strong>itially a transition to OER may seem like a quick economic fix for reduc<strong>in</strong>g costs<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g resource accessibility, it br<strong>in</strong>gs with it a variety <strong>of</strong> multi-layered issues – e.g.,<br />
copyright <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual property issues, OER quality, relevance <strong>and</strong> applicability, resistance<br />
from faculty <strong>and</strong> the publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>open</strong>ness (D’Antoni &<br />
Savage, 2009; Wiley, 2010) – each <strong>of</strong> which need to be addressed before successfully<br />
implement<strong>in</strong>g a full-scale OER solution. In addition, <strong>in</strong>stitutions need to weigh the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>open</strong>ness they choose to engage <strong>in</strong>, as well as consider the advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages <strong>of</strong><br />
their approach. This paper will discuss def<strong>in</strong>itions <strong>of</strong> <strong>open</strong>ness <strong>and</strong> OER, the benefits <strong>and</strong><br />
challenges <strong>of</strong> OER, <strong>and</strong> current OER implementation strategies, while present<strong>in</strong>g three case<br />
studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>distance</strong> education <strong>in</strong>stitutions that have adopted OER <strong>and</strong> a summary <strong>of</strong> best<br />
practices.<br />
Literature Review<br />
Lane (2009) identifies two def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g factors <strong>of</strong> <strong>open</strong>ness: free accessibility us<strong>in</strong>g the Internet<br />
<strong>and</strong> limited restriction <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g resources, which <strong>in</strong>cludes free access to source code, no<br />
subscription or licens<strong>in</strong>g fees, <strong>and</strong> little or no restrictions to copyright <strong>and</strong> licens<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Openness <strong>in</strong> education can exist <strong>in</strong> many forms: <strong>open</strong> access textbooks <strong>and</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>open</strong><br />
courseware, <strong>open</strong> source s<strong>of</strong>tware (OSS), massive <strong>open</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e courses, <strong>open</strong> course design,<br />
<strong>open</strong> delivery, <strong>open</strong> <strong>research</strong>, <strong>open</strong> evaluation, reflection, <strong>and</strong> scholarship, <strong>and</strong> <strong>open</strong> policy<br />
(Weller, 2014; Conole & Weller, 2010). OER occupy “a middle ground, <strong>in</strong>tersect<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>open</strong><br />
access, through <strong>open</strong> textbooks, <strong>and</strong> MOOCs, which can be seen as a subset <strong>of</strong> OERs” (Weller,<br />
2014; p.85). The first def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> OER emerged from a UNESCO conference <strong>in</strong> 2002, which<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ed OER as “The <strong>open</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> educational resources, enabled by <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong><br />
communication technologies, for consultation, use <strong>and</strong> adaptation by a community <strong>of</strong> users<br />
for non-commercial purposes” (Hylén, 2009; para.6). In 2002, UNESCO further broadened<br />
that def<strong>in</strong>ition, stat<strong>in</strong>g that OER are “digitalized materials <strong>of</strong>fered freely <strong>and</strong> <strong>open</strong>ly to<br />
educators, students <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent learners to use <strong>and</strong> reuse for teach<strong>in</strong>g, learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>research</strong>” (OECD, 2007; p.10). Hylén (2009) exp<strong>and</strong>ed on this def<strong>in</strong>ition further, categoriz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
173