10.01.2017 Views

Forging new pathways of research and innovation in open and distance learning

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Integration <strong>of</strong> Learn<strong>in</strong>g Analytics <strong>in</strong> Blended Learn<strong>in</strong>g Course at a University <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Kristie Naidoo, Richard Naidoo<br />

Question (c) was also based on prov<strong>in</strong>g an identity. It also required quotients <strong>and</strong> reciprocal<br />

functions. This question required simplification <strong>of</strong> both sides <strong>of</strong> the equation to prove<br />

equivalence.<br />

Prove tan x+ cot x= sec x+<br />

cosec x<br />

s<strong>in</strong> x<br />

Cod<strong>in</strong>g scheme: 1 mark for writ<strong>in</strong>g tan x = <strong>and</strong><br />

cos x<br />

the LHS <strong>and</strong> 1 mark for show<strong>in</strong>g equivalence.<br />

cos x<br />

cot x = , 1 mark for simplify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

s<strong>in</strong> x<br />

Question (d) required application <strong>of</strong> reduction formula, special angles <strong>and</strong> co-ratios.<br />

Prove<br />

( °−x) ( x− ° ) ( °+ x)<br />

( °− x) ( °− x)<br />

°<br />

s<strong>in</strong> 90 sec 360 tan 180<br />

cosec 180 cot 90 cos 0<br />

= s<strong>in</strong> x<br />

Cod<strong>in</strong>g scheme: 1 mark for correct simplification <strong>of</strong> each expression on the LHS <strong>and</strong> 1 mark<br />

for show<strong>in</strong>g equivalence.<br />

Question (e) required application <strong>of</strong> special angles <strong>and</strong> negative angles.<br />

Prove<br />

2 2<br />

( ) ( ) ( )<br />

2 2<br />

( − ° ) °+ ( − ° ) − °<br />

cot 240 °+ s<strong>in</strong> − 225 ° − cos 30 ° + sec − 330 ° 1 = 3 −<br />

s<strong>in</strong> 210 cos 0 s<strong>in</strong> 60 s<strong>in</strong> 210 4<br />

Cod<strong>in</strong>g scheme: 1 mark for correct simplification <strong>of</strong> each expression on the LHS <strong>and</strong> 1 mark<br />

for show<strong>in</strong>g equivalence.<br />

Results<br />

Table 1 shows the error classification for each item from the assessments that were concerned<br />

with basic trigonometry. Students encountered more structural errors than, executive errors<br />

<strong>and</strong> arbitrary errors.<br />

Table 1: Classification <strong>of</strong> errors<br />

Classification <strong>of</strong><br />

Items<br />

Structural<br />

Error<br />

Executive<br />

Error<br />

Arbitrary<br />

Error<br />

Item (a) 55 43 22<br />

Item (b) 73 37 24<br />

Item (c) 57 28 21<br />

Item (d) 86 36 18<br />

Item (e) 68 38 19<br />

Discussion<br />

In question (a) the majority <strong>of</strong> the students were able to make the correct substitution but still<br />

failed to prove the identity. The descriptive analytics <strong>in</strong>dicate that frames from the algebra<br />

doma<strong>in</strong> were underdeveloped. 55 structural errors (37 percent) <strong>and</strong> 43 executive errors (29<br />

percent) <strong>and</strong> 22 arbitrary errors (15 percent) were recorded. These are <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>correct<br />

Reach<strong>in</strong>g from the roots – 9 th EDEN Research Workshop Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, 2016, Oldenburg 275<br />

ISBN 978-615-5511-12-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!