10.01.2017 Views

Forging new pathways of research and innovation in open and distance learning

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Connect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Onl<strong>in</strong>e Environment: Student Preferences for Communication with Faculty<br />

Jill Buban<br />

Phase One <strong>of</strong> the study consisted <strong>of</strong> a questionnaire that was adapted from the ECAR National<br />

Study <strong>of</strong> Undergraduate Students <strong>and</strong> Information Technology Survey that was widely<br />

distributed to undergraduate students (n = 2000) while Phase 2 consisted <strong>of</strong> a multiple case<br />

study approach guided <strong>in</strong>-depth <strong>in</strong>terviews with six students. Each student provided<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about the role communication technology played <strong>in</strong> their experiences with their<br />

mentors <strong>and</strong> their academic mentor<strong>in</strong>g relationship. In both phases, study participants<br />

provided <strong>in</strong>formation about their ownership <strong>of</strong> various communication technologies <strong>and</strong><br />

usage <strong>of</strong> communication technologies with their faculty mentors <strong>and</strong> with others (i.e., family,<br />

friends).<br />

F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from both phases <strong>of</strong> the study yielded <strong>in</strong>formation about the scope <strong>of</strong> experiences<br />

adult onl<strong>in</strong>e students have us<strong>in</strong>g communication technology <strong>in</strong> their faculty mentor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

relationships. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs show that students prefer more communication with their faculty<br />

mentors <strong>and</strong> parameters for academic mentor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the virtual world need to be prescribed. A<br />

cross-case analysis provided themes that spanned case <strong>in</strong>clude: communication patterns,<br />

communication preferences, <strong>and</strong> the mentor experience.<br />

Technology ownership <strong>and</strong> access<br />

The questionnaire responses revealed that nearly all students own a phone, computer <strong>and</strong><br />

WiFi access which provides them with access to onl<strong>in</strong>e education; a type <strong>of</strong> access that was a<br />

barrier to onl<strong>in</strong>e education as recently as the past decade (S<strong>in</strong>gle & S<strong>in</strong>gle, 2005). This access<br />

provides many work<strong>in</strong>g adults the ability to complete their educational goals. These tools not<br />

only provide access, but they provide students with the ability to communicate with their<br />

mentors <strong>in</strong> a virtual environment.<br />

The types <strong>of</strong> technology to which a student has access may also play a role <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g<br />

communications between students <strong>and</strong> faculty mentors. All (n = 273) respondents <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

they owned a computer; 97% own a phone, 62% own telephone-like applications, <strong>and</strong> onethird<br />

own an iPad/tablet (35%). Most respondents (82.4%) <strong>in</strong>dicated that they have a WiFi<br />

connection, an Internet access feature that is typically a barrier to onl<strong>in</strong>e learn<strong>in</strong>g for students<br />

<strong>in</strong> rural areas. Because ownership doesn’t necessarily <strong>in</strong>dicate use, <strong>in</strong>formation about usage <strong>of</strong><br />

devices by students with their mentors was collected See Table 1). While phone <strong>and</strong> computer<br />

are used with mentors <strong>and</strong> friends <strong>and</strong> family, telephone-like communication is used at a<br />

higher percentage with friends <strong>and</strong> family (See Table 2).<br />

Table 1: Technology used with faculty mentor as categorized by percentage <strong>of</strong> sample age<br />

Age Phone Computer E-Reader Telephone-like Communication<br />

18-25 (n = 29) 75.9 100 - 6.9<br />

26-37 (n = 100) 70 98 10 -<br />

38-50 (n = 105) 64.8 97.1 - 6.7<br />

51+ (n = 39) 66.7 94.9 2.6 1.3<br />

Reach<strong>in</strong>g from the roots – 9 th EDEN Research Workshop Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, 2016, Oldenburg 89<br />

ISBN 978-615-5511-12-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!