10.01.2017 Views

Forging new pathways of research and innovation in open and distance learning

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Connect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Onl<strong>in</strong>e Environment: Student Preferences for Communication with Faculty<br />

Jill Buban<br />

<strong>and</strong> students. Faculty <strong>and</strong> students disagreed on the preferred communication method.<br />

Faculty preferred face-to-face communication while students preferred email. A previous<br />

study completed by Jones <strong>in</strong> 2002 revealed that 46% <strong>of</strong> students stated that “email allows them<br />

to express ideas to pr<strong>of</strong>essors that they otherwise would not express <strong>in</strong> person” (As cited by<br />

Endres & Tis<strong>in</strong>ger, 2007). In a pilot study conducted <strong>in</strong> 2012, two emerg<strong>in</strong>g adult (18-25 years<br />

old) <strong>in</strong>terview participants stated the same feel<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> regards to email use. In this study,<br />

students were asked their preference for communication with their faculty mentor. In one <strong>of</strong><br />

six <strong>in</strong>terviews conducted for this study, a 26-37-year-old female expressed the same op<strong>in</strong>ion;<br />

that email allowed her to express what she might not say <strong>in</strong> person. The topic <strong>of</strong> preference for<br />

email communication with a mentor is further discussed <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs section <strong>of</strong> this paper.<br />

Dahlstrom et al., (2011) found that 60% <strong>of</strong> undergraduate students agree that a major benefit<br />

<strong>of</strong> technology is that it makes them feel connected to pr<strong>of</strong>essors <strong>and</strong> other college/university<br />

staff. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from the study that serves as the basis for this paper contribute to the<br />

earlier Dahlstrom study <strong>in</strong> that 50% (n = 3) <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview participants discussed how the use <strong>of</strong><br />

social media sites such as Facebook <strong>and</strong> L<strong>in</strong>kedIn made them feel more connected to their<br />

faculty <strong>and</strong> peers <strong>in</strong> their classes. Dahlstrom et al. (2011) also <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to technologies<br />

that students value <strong>and</strong> want on campus. One student responded that she wished “<strong>in</strong>structors<br />

emailed more so that students <strong>and</strong> teachers could communicate easier, faster, <strong>and</strong> more<br />

efficiently” (p.17) while 79% <strong>of</strong> students reported that they use email to communicate with<br />

their pr<strong>of</strong>essors.<br />

Other communication technologies that students would like their <strong>in</strong>structors to utilize or<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude are onl<strong>in</strong>e forums or bullet<strong>in</strong> boards; onl<strong>in</strong>e chats, chat events, text messages; <strong>and</strong><br />

Wikis (p.17). These student preferences for technology use suggest that Faculty mentors <strong>and</strong><br />

advisors need to discuss communication preferences with their students <strong>in</strong> order to f<strong>in</strong>d a<br />

common tool that both are comfortable us<strong>in</strong>g to communicate. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Dahlstrom et al.<br />

(2011), the Millennial <strong>and</strong> Generation X age groups, prefer <strong>and</strong> are used to communicat<strong>in</strong>g via<br />

email, social network<strong>in</strong>g sites, <strong>and</strong> text messag<strong>in</strong>g, while the baby boom generation (ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

the teachers <strong>and</strong> mentors) tend to communicate solely via email. Generational differences<br />

surround<strong>in</strong>g technology preferences for communication are discussed further <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

section <strong>of</strong> this paper.<br />

Research design<br />

The study was conducted at a public higher education <strong>in</strong>stitution that has served adult<br />

learners s<strong>in</strong>ce 1971. The <strong>in</strong>stitution began <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>distance</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g courses 25 years ago as<br />

correspondence courses which have s<strong>in</strong>ce evolved <strong>in</strong>to onl<strong>in</strong>e courses. Onl<strong>in</strong>e students<br />

account for roughly 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stitution’s enrolment <strong>and</strong>, while the average student<br />

age is 36 (Benke et al., 2012), the availability <strong>of</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e degrees has attracted younger students<br />

<strong>in</strong> more recent years to now <strong>in</strong>clude18 year-olds to sexagenarians.<br />

88 Reach<strong>in</strong>g from the roots – 9 th EDEN Research Workshop Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, 2016, Oldenburg<br />

ISBN 978-615-5511-12-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!