10.01.2017 Views

Forging new pathways of research and innovation in open and distance learning

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Investigat<strong>in</strong>g the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the ‘Onl<strong>in</strong>e Learner Pr<strong>of</strong>il<strong>in</strong>g Questionnaire’<br />

<strong>in</strong> Generat<strong>in</strong>g a Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Learners Based on Learner Dispositions: A Pilot Study<br />

Pengiran Shaiffadzillah Pengiran Omarali<br />

The method <strong>of</strong> factor analysis <strong>in</strong>volves the “identification <strong>of</strong> factors (…) based on correlations<br />

between variables {<strong>and</strong> that} for a good solution, groups <strong>of</strong> variables need to be correlated”<br />

(Hutcheson & Safroniou, 1999; p.233). Therefore, <strong>in</strong> order for the solution to be robust, it<br />

must be determ<strong>in</strong>ed beforeh<strong>and</strong> that the variables computed <strong>in</strong>to the analysis are <strong>in</strong>deed<br />

correlated. The non-normality <strong>of</strong> the data posed a problem because factors are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

Pearson correlation. However, “Pearson’s r may <strong>in</strong>flate Type I error rates <strong>and</strong> reduce power”<br />

(Bishara & Hittner, 2012) <strong>and</strong> that “Pearson r could be exaggerated by non-normal data<br />

{whereby} bias could be as high as +.14, particularly with a Heavy-Tailed distribution for one<br />

variable <strong>and</strong> a small sample size (n = 10)” (Bishara & Hittner, 2014; p.10). In literature, the<br />

sensitivity <strong>of</strong> Pearson’s r for non-normal data led to suggestions for either data transformation<br />

to restore normality, or the use <strong>of</strong> other correlation methods. This pilot study has identified<br />

Spearman’s rho as an alternative method that is less sensitive to non-normal data. It is also<br />

less sensitive to outliers compared to Pearson (Abdullah, 1990; Balakrishnan & Lai, 2009)<br />

because a few variables tested positive for outliers. Nonetheless, the opted correlation test<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was Spearman as most relevant for non-normally distributed ord<strong>in</strong>al data. Items with 2-tailed<br />

statistical significance with moderate correlation coefficient r = > 0.5 were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

whereas items that were below the coefficient threshold were omitted, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 35 items <strong>of</strong><br />

recognized correlations. Consequently, a second factor analysis was performed on the 35<br />

items, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a def<strong>in</strong>ite positive matrix with a Varimax rotation converg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 12<br />

iterations (see Table 1).<br />

104 Reach<strong>in</strong>g from the roots – 9 th EDEN Research Workshop Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, 2016, Oldenburg<br />

ISBN 978-615-5511-12-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!