10.01.2017 Views

Forging new pathways of research and innovation in open and distance learning

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

RW_2016_Oldenburg_Proceedings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Forg<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>new</strong> <strong>pathways</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>novation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>open</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>distance</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Reach<strong>in</strong>g from the roots<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the 9 th European Distance <strong>and</strong> E-Learn<strong>in</strong>g Network Research Workshop, 2016<br />

Oldenburg, 4-6 October, 2016<br />

ISBN 978-615-5511-12-7<br />

CONNECTING IN THE ONLINE ENVIRONMENT:<br />

STUDENT PREFERENCES FOR COMMUNICATION WITH FACULTY<br />

Jill Buban, Onl<strong>in</strong>e Learn<strong>in</strong>g Consortium, United States <strong>of</strong> America<br />

Summary<br />

Whether it be <strong>in</strong> the onl<strong>in</strong>e or blended modality, learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> these formats<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes a heightened use <strong>of</strong> technology. The focus <strong>of</strong> this paper is a study that exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

undergraduate adult students’ experiences <strong>in</strong> academic faculty mentor<strong>in</strong>g relationships that<br />

use technology for communication. Through an exploratory mixed methods study, a<br />

questionnaire <strong>of</strong> 273 students <strong>and</strong> six case studies revealed students’ preferences for<br />

technology use <strong>and</strong> their preferences for communication with their faculty mentors. The<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs provide <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to how students, faculty, <strong>and</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrators can beg<strong>in</strong> a<br />

conversation about best practices for student-faculty communication <strong>in</strong> the onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

environment.<br />

Introduction<br />

Communication between the faculty mentor <strong>and</strong> student is an important variable related to<br />

persistence among learners <strong>in</strong> both traditional <strong>and</strong> virtual environments (Ste<strong>in</strong> & Glazer,<br />

2003). A benchmark<strong>in</strong>g study, Best Practices <strong>in</strong> Adult Learn<strong>in</strong>g (Council for Adult <strong>and</strong><br />

Experiential Learn<strong>in</strong>g – CAEL, 1999), found that communication is a top priority <strong>in</strong> adult<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g focused <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>and</strong> is <strong>in</strong>strumental <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g the needs <strong>of</strong> adult learners. Oneto-one<br />

communication, as demonstrated by the academic mentor<strong>in</strong>g model, is crucial to adult<br />

learners’ successes. This type <strong>of</strong> communication is evident <strong>in</strong> student-staff communication,<br />

student-faculty communication, <strong>and</strong> student-peer communication (1999; p.44). In exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

undergraduate adult students’ experiences us<strong>in</strong>g onl<strong>in</strong>e technology for communication with<br />

their faculty mentors, the study explored how factors such as students’ age, gender, <strong>and</strong><br />

culture impacts their preference for a form <strong>of</strong> technology with which to communicate with a<br />

faculty mentor.<br />

Background<br />

A 2008 study (Jones, Johnson-Yale, Millermaier, & Perez, 2008) assessed U.S. college students’<br />

Internet use for academic work, <strong>and</strong> explored how the Internet has affected both their<br />

academic <strong>and</strong> social lives. The <strong>research</strong>ers’ literature review identified advantages <strong>of</strong> Internet<br />

use for student-pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g speed, the ability to record correspondence,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to communicate asynchronously; the disadvantages <strong>in</strong>clude mis<strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> email<br />

messages <strong>and</strong> excessive quantity <strong>of</strong> email messages, which can be time consum<strong>in</strong>g for faculty<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!