Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
9 Climate Change 158<br />
The last chapters in this book, beginning with Chapter 18, deal with<br />
human factors that c<strong>on</strong>tribute to our prospects, ending at Chapter 20<br />
discussing mitigati<strong>on</strong> strategies at the individual level. It’s not geoengineering,<br />
but behavioral adaptati<strong>on</strong> leading to reducti<strong>on</strong> can have a<br />
huge impact, if broadly adopted.<br />
9.6 Upshot: Climate Change is Serious<br />
Despite the ease with which we can dem<strong>on</strong>strate that the measured<br />
CO 2 is from fossil fuels, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the straightforward physics governing the<br />
equilibrium temperature in the face of greenhouse gases, it is astounding<br />
that we are not fully embracing reality. But perhaps it should not<br />
be surprising. Climate change is a clear-<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>-present affr<strong>on</strong>t to some<br />
ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> political ideologies that wish we would let markets set<br />
our path, with no c<strong>on</strong>sequence. But operating in denial <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> insisting<br />
that we keep to the way things worked in the past is not our smartest<br />
play. Climate change is a stark indicati<strong>on</strong> that we can’t just do whatever<br />
makes us the most m<strong>on</strong>ey. Alternatives to fossil fuels are expensive <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
less c<strong>on</strong>venient. Climate change is bad for business, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> also threatens<br />
capitalism by imposing limits <strong>on</strong> our ambiti<strong>on</strong>s. It is little w<strong>on</strong>der that<br />
the U.S. has been am<strong>on</strong>g the most resistant to accepting climate change<br />
realities, being the most proud capitalist country, boasting an enormous<br />
per-capita energy dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> having c<strong>on</strong>tributed the most to global<br />
CO 2 emissi<strong>on</strong>s throughout history (Figure 9.5).<br />
As real as climate change is, it is less clear whether it represents an<br />
existential threat to civilizati<strong>on</strong>. 72 As costly as it may be to adapt, 73<br />
the changes are gradual enough <strong>on</strong> a human timescale to possibly be<br />
manageable—though decidedly less than fun.<br />
Resource 74 disrupti<strong>on</strong>s, however, can send markets into free-fall <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
stimulate global military acti<strong>on</strong>s that could be far more devastating <strong>on</strong> a<br />
shorter timescale. We are in a sort of a race to see which causes the biggest<br />
problem the so<strong>on</strong>est. With luck, a third opti<strong>on</strong> presents itself that does<br />
not involve such hardship. But just keep in mind that human society is a<br />
highly n<strong>on</strong>linear c<strong>on</strong>struct that could become unrecognizably disrupted<br />
<strong>on</strong> a much faster scale than will be the case for the physics-governed<br />
unfolding of climate change.<br />
72: Is it apocalyptic, or just very painful?<br />
73: . . . ab<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>on</strong>ing some coastal areas, migrating<br />
away from unsurvivable climate<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>s, reducing populati<strong>on</strong> to deal with<br />
decline of agricultural resources, adapting<br />
to new ecosystems robbed of some species<br />
74: . . . e.g., energy, water, food, mined substances<br />
9.7 Problems<br />
1. If you were asked to characterize a typical carb<strong>on</strong> cost of fossil<br />
fuels, in grams of CO 2 emitted per gram of input fuel, what single<br />
simple number would be a good approximati<strong>on</strong> to all three types,<br />
referring to Table 9.1?<br />
© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />
Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.