01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 Biological <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> 237<br />

4. How many logs of firewood per day (whose parameters are specified<br />

in Problem 3) would you need to burn to provide 5,000 W of<br />

heating to a house?<br />

5. Replicate the c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> of Box 14.3 by assuming <strong>on</strong>e-quarter of<br />

the 2 trilli<strong>on</strong> t<strong>on</strong>s (5 × 10 1 4 kg) of mass is combustible at 4kcal/g.<br />

How l<strong>on</strong>g—in years—would this amount of energy last if burning<br />

at 18 TW?<br />

6. Given the energy densities of ethanol vs. octane (gasoline), how<br />

many liters of ethanol does it take to replace <strong>on</strong>e liter of gasoline,<br />

if the densities are 789 g/L for ethanol <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 703 g/L for octane?<br />

7. If 50 kJ of energy are spent to extract 1 MJ of energy c<strong>on</strong>tent in the<br />

form of coal, what is the EROEI?<br />

8. Re-express an EROEI of 1.5:1 in terms of how many total units of<br />

energy must be produced in order to extract <strong>on</strong>e unit of net energy<br />

in a self-supporting operati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

9. Imagine that the extracti<strong>on</strong> of a low-EROEI biofuel is performed<br />

using energy derived from that biofuel al<strong>on</strong>e—in other words, a<br />

self-c<strong>on</strong>tained operati<strong>on</strong> not using any other (external) form of<br />

energy. We can think of the situati<strong>on</strong> thusly: for each hectare of<br />

l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> producing fuel for external use, some additi<strong>on</strong>al l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> must<br />

be dedicated to raising the energy used to perform the extracti<strong>on</strong><br />

operati<strong>on</strong>—like an overhead. If the EROEI is 1.5:1, 34 how much<br />

total l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> area would need to be devoted to the endeavor for<br />

every hectare (or any area unit you wish) that c<strong>on</strong>tributes to net<br />

producti<strong>on</strong>? See Problem 8 for a related scenario.<br />

34: You can always multiply both sides by<br />

the same factor to make both sides integers,<br />

if this is easier to underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

10. It takes a certain energy investment to fabricate a solar panel.<br />

Referring to Table 14.1, figure out how many years of the panel’s<br />

output energy it takes to “pay off” the investment if the EROEI<br />

estimate assumed operati<strong>on</strong> for 30 years.<br />

11. Our modern food industry has an EROEI of 0.1:1. In pre-industrial<br />

settings, when energy investment for food producti<strong>on</strong> was in the<br />

form of muscle power (animal <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> human), why would a 0.1:1<br />

EROEI for food have been untenable? Next, describe the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

for an exact break-even food EROEI of 1:1. What would this mean<br />

in terms of where effort/energy goes? What would this leave for<br />

building shelters, cathedrals, or esthetic pursuits?<br />

12. Parallel the development in the text for the l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> required for corn<br />

ethanol if it is self-sufficient 35 in the case for EROEI of 1.5:1—near<br />

the optimistic end of the range. How much larger is this than the<br />

area now devoted to corn, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> how does it compare to total arable<br />

l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> in the U.S.?<br />

35: . . . i.e., relying <strong>on</strong> its own energy to<br />

re-invest in its extracti<strong>on</strong><br />

13. Using the setup for Problem 12, how large would the required corn<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!