01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15 Nuclear <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> 266<br />

walls of the chamber, despite its c<strong>on</strong>stituents zipping around at speeds<br />

around 1,000 km/s! This feat can be sort-of managed via magnetic fields<br />

bending the paths of the fast-moving charged particles into circles. But<br />

turbulence in the plasma plagues attempts to c<strong>on</strong>fine the D–T mixture<br />

at temperatures high enough to produce fusi<strong>on</strong> yield.<br />

Box 15.6: Successful Fusi<strong>on</strong><br />

Note that besides stars as an example of successful fusi<strong>on</strong>, we have<br />

managed to create artificial fusi<strong>on</strong> in a net-energy-positive manner in<br />

theformofthehydrogen bomb. This is indeed a fusi<strong>on</strong> device, but<br />

we could not call it c<strong>on</strong>trolled fusi<strong>on</strong>. It actually takes a fissi<strong>on</strong> bomb<br />

(plut<strong>on</strong>ium) right next to the D–T mixture in a hydrogen bomb to<br />

heat up the D–T enough to undergo fusi<strong>on</strong>. It’s neat (<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> awful) that<br />

it works <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> is dem<strong>on</strong>strated, but it’s no way to run a power plant.<br />

If a 45 milli<strong>on</strong> degree plasma could be c<strong>on</strong>fined in a stable fashi<strong>on</strong>, the<br />

heat generated by the reacti<strong>on</strong>s 64 could be used to make steam <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

run a traditi<strong>on</strong>al power plant—replacing the flame symbol in Fig. 6.2<br />

(p. 90) with something much fancier. The scheme, therefore, requires first<br />

heating a plasma to unbelievable temperatures in order for the plasma<br />

to self-generate enough additi<strong>on</strong>al heat through fusi<strong>on</strong> that the game<br />

shifts to <strong>on</strong>e of keeping the plasma cool enough to produce a steady rate<br />

of fusi<strong>on</strong> without blowing itself out. In this scenario, the heat extracted<br />

from the cooling flow makes steam. It’s the most elaborate 65 possible<br />

source of heat to boil water. It may be a bit like working hard to develop<br />

a light saber whose <strong>on</strong>ly use will be as a letter opener.<br />

64: ...in the form of radioactive release<br />

back to the plasma<br />

65: Should we be proud if we succeed, or<br />

embarrassed at the lengths we had to go to?<br />

15.5.1 Fuel Abundance<br />

Deuterium—an isotope of hydrogen—is found in 0.0115% of hydrogen, 66<br />

Therefore sea water is chock-full of deuterium. The global 18 TW appetite 67: . . . <strong>on</strong>e H<br />

which means that the occasi<strong>on</strong>al H 2 O molecule is actually HDO. 67<br />

would need 3 × 10 32 deuterium atoms per year for D–D or 2 × 10 32 each<br />

of deuterium <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> tritium atoms per year for D–T. Running with this<br />

latter number for the comparatively easier D–T reacti<strong>on</strong>, we would<br />

need to process 9 × 10 35 water molecules each year to find the requisite<br />

deuterium. This corresp<strong>on</strong>ds to 26 milli<strong>on</strong> t<strong>on</strong>s of water, which is a cubic<br />

volume about 300 m <strong>on</strong> a side. Yes, that’s large, but the ocean is larger.<br />

Also, it corresp<strong>on</strong>ds to a volume of 0.16 billi<strong>on</strong> barrels per year, which<br />

is about 200 times smaller than our annual oil c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong>. Thus, the<br />

volume required should be not at all challenging. 68 The ocean volume<br />

is 60 billi<strong>on</strong> times larger than our 300-m-sided cube, implying that we<br />

have enough deuterium for 60 billi<strong>on</strong> years. The sun will not live that<br />

l<strong>on</strong>g, so let’s say that we have sufficient deuterium <strong>on</strong> Earth.<br />

66: See the Chart of the Nuclides abundance<br />

informati<strong>on</strong> in Figure 15.4.<br />

1 , <strong>on</strong>e 2 H <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e oxygen<br />

68: Ocean water is far easier to access than<br />

underground oil deposits, after all.<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!