01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 Adaptati<strong>on</strong> Strategies 329<br />

1. The earth has never had to accommodate 8 billi<strong>on</strong> people at this<br />

level of resource dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>;<br />

2. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Human</str<strong>on</strong>g>kind has never run out of a resource as vital as fossil fuels;<br />

3. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Human</str<strong>on</strong>g>s have never until now altered the atmosphere to the point<br />

of changing the planet’s thermal equilibrium;<br />

4. We have never before witnessed species extincti<strong>on</strong> at this rate, or<br />

seen such dramatic changes to wild spaces <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> to the ocean.<br />

Just because something big has not happened yet does not c<strong>on</strong>stitute<br />

str<strong>on</strong>g evidence that it cannot or will not. But more important than that<br />

argument—which is always true—is the number of credible causes for<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cern that are evident today.<br />

Also important to recognize is that a challenge cannot be effectively<br />

mitigated unless it is first identified <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> acknowledged. The very lack of<br />

collective awareness about a credible risk of collapse is itself unsettling. If<br />

open discussi<strong>on</strong> of the possibility of collapse were not so uncomfortable<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> off-putting, we would st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a better chance of preventing its<br />

unfolding. It would be a huge relief to be wr<strong>on</strong>g about the c<strong>on</strong>cern. But<br />

not taking it seriously represents a colossal risk.<br />

Box 20.1: The Y2K Scare<br />

The Y2K 1 scare in 1999 offers a good template for how to mitigate a<br />

potential disaster. Computer systems became the dominant means<br />

for managing financial <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> government records, transacti<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

accounts in the 1960s through 1980s. A two-digit code was used<br />

for the year in many records, not anticipating the roll-over to 2000<br />

decades away. The early programmers either doubted that their code<br />

would still be functi<strong>on</strong>ing in 2000 2 or assumed it would be cleaned<br />

up in time. In the year or two leading up to Y2K, the issue got t<strong>on</strong>s of<br />

coverage <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> predicti<strong>on</strong>s of mayhem, as peoples’ digital lives—a new<br />

phenomen<strong>on</strong>—were tossed into any number of unknown upheavals.<br />

But the very fact that the issue dominated public c<strong>on</strong>sciousness was<br />

exactly what ensured a smooth transiti<strong>on</strong>. Every bank <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> agency<br />

got <strong>on</strong> the job <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Y2K came <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> went without a ripple. It would<br />

be great to see a repeat in the case of potential collapse. The lack<br />

of a specific time predicti<strong>on</strong> is <strong>on</strong>e barrier, unlike Y2K. Without a<br />

firm deadline or a clear-<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>-present danger, the temptati<strong>on</strong> to delay<br />

serious attenti<strong>on</strong> is str<strong>on</strong>g.<br />

1: Y2K is short for year-2000.<br />

2: Surprise—it was!<br />

A key c<strong>on</strong>tributor to awareness is in how informati<strong>on</strong> sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> activities<br />

shape opini<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> views. A world overflowing with informati<strong>on</strong><br />

can be difficult to navigate, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> has a tendency to coagulate into isolated<br />

domains that cater to predispositi<strong>on</strong>s. The result can be disagreement<br />

<strong>on</strong> basic facts, making coordinated progress difficult. Luckily, attentive<br />

individuals can perform an assessment of the trustworthiness of various<br />

informati<strong>on</strong> outlets. The process is to watch an entire live event, like a<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!