01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11 Hydroelectric <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> 175<br />

a small finger. We want to know how much mass must be lifted to<br />

yield the same amount of gravitati<strong>on</strong>al potential energy as is c<strong>on</strong>tained<br />

in a battery or equivalent volume of gasoline. In the comparis<strong>on</strong>, we<br />

will imagine having a hoist that can lift a large mass 7 4 m high—about<br />

house-height.<br />

A st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ard AA battery cell has a charge rating of 2.5 Ah 8 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> operates<br />

at about 1.5 V. Following the development in Sec. 5.8 (p. 76), we multiply<br />

these two numbers to get 3.75 Wh, translating to 13.5 kJ. Equating this to<br />

mgh, where we know g ≈ 10 m/s 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> h 4 m, we find that m ≈ 340 kg.<br />

That’s really heavy—about the mass of 4–5 people. 9 Meanwhile, the AA<br />

battery is a puny 0.023 kg. Reflect for a moment <strong>on</strong> this comparis<strong>on</strong>,<br />

visualizing 340 kg lifted 4 m above the ground providing the same<br />

amount of energy as a AA battery held in your h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

7: ...arock, for instance<br />

8: The number is usually given as, e.g.,<br />

2,500 mAh (milli-amp-hours).<br />

9: Amuse yourself by picturing 4–5 people<br />

slung haphazardly into a net <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> hoisted<br />

to roof height—a very odd (<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> grumpy?)<br />

replacement for a AA battery.<br />

Gasoline is even more extreme. At an energy density around 34 kJ per<br />

mL of volume, filling a AA-sized cup 10<br />

10: . . . just over 7 mL<br />

with gasoline yields about 250 kJ<br />

of energy. 11 Performing the same computati<strong>on</strong>, we would need to lift over<br />

6,000 kg (6 metric t<strong>on</strong>s) to a height of4mtogetthesame energy c<strong>on</strong>tent.<br />

Typical cars have masses in the 1,000–2,000 kg range, so we’re talking<br />

about something like 4 cars! One caveat is that we are not typically able<br />

to c<strong>on</strong>vert the thermal energy in gasoline 12 into useful work at much<br />

12: . . . via combusti<strong>on</strong>; see Sec. 6.4 (p. 88)<br />

better than 25%, while gravitati<strong>on</strong>al potential energy can be c<strong>on</strong>verted<br />

at nearly 100%. Still, being able to lift 1,500 kg 13 to a height of 4 m using<br />

the energy in 7 mL of gasoline is rather impressive, again emphasizing<br />

that gravitati<strong>on</strong>al potential energy is pretty weak. It <strong>on</strong>ly amounts to<br />

significance when the masses (volumes) of water are rather large.<br />

11: Thus, gasoline is nearly 20 times as<br />

energy-dense as a AA battery by volume.<br />

Usually, we will discuss energy density by<br />

mass, in which case the ∼5× denser battery<br />

provides nearly 100× less energy per gram<br />

than does gasoline.<br />

13: ...now just <strong>on</strong>e car, rather than four;<br />

it means this small volume of gasoline can<br />

propel a car up a4mhill<br />

11.2 Hydroelectric <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

The basic idea behind hydroelectricity is that water in a reservoir behind<br />

a dam (Figure 11.2) creates pressure at the base of the dam that can<br />

force water to flow through a turbine that drives a generator to make<br />

electricity—sharing elements of Fig. 6.2 (p. 90) but spinning the turbine<br />

by water flow instead. The amount of energy available works out to be<br />

the gravitati<strong>on</strong>al potential energy corresp<strong>on</strong>ding to the height of water<br />

at the lake’s surface relative to the water level <strong>on</strong> the other side. It’s as<br />

if dropping the water from the surface to the turbine <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> asking how<br />

much potential energy it gave up in the process. In reality, water is not<br />

dropping from the lake surface, but the force <strong>on</strong> the water at the turbine<br />

is determined by the height of water above it: the “pressure head,” as<br />

it is called. The process is highly efficient, approaching 90% capture of<br />

the potential energy in the water delivered as electrical power from the<br />

generator.<br />

reservoir<br />

high pressure<br />

turbine blades<br />

penstock<br />

h<br />

river<br />

Figure 11.2: Cross secti<strong>on</strong> of a dam, holding<br />

back a reservoir of water at height, h,over<br />

the downstream river.<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!