Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
11 Hydroelectric <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> 175<br />
a small finger. We want to know how much mass must be lifted to<br />
yield the same amount of gravitati<strong>on</strong>al potential energy as is c<strong>on</strong>tained<br />
in a battery or equivalent volume of gasoline. In the comparis<strong>on</strong>, we<br />
will imagine having a hoist that can lift a large mass 7 4 m high—about<br />
house-height.<br />
A st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ard AA battery cell has a charge rating of 2.5 Ah 8 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> operates<br />
at about 1.5 V. Following the development in Sec. 5.8 (p. 76), we multiply<br />
these two numbers to get 3.75 Wh, translating to 13.5 kJ. Equating this to<br />
mgh, where we know g ≈ 10 m/s 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> h 4 m, we find that m ≈ 340 kg.<br />
That’s really heavy—about the mass of 4–5 people. 9 Meanwhile, the AA<br />
battery is a puny 0.023 kg. Reflect for a moment <strong>on</strong> this comparis<strong>on</strong>,<br />
visualizing 340 kg lifted 4 m above the ground providing the same<br />
amount of energy as a AA battery held in your h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />
7: ...arock, for instance<br />
8: The number is usually given as, e.g.,<br />
2,500 mAh (milli-amp-hours).<br />
9: Amuse yourself by picturing 4–5 people<br />
slung haphazardly into a net <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> hoisted<br />
to roof height—a very odd (<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> grumpy?)<br />
replacement for a AA battery.<br />
Gasoline is even more extreme. At an energy density around 34 kJ per<br />
mL of volume, filling a AA-sized cup 10<br />
10: . . . just over 7 mL<br />
with gasoline yields about 250 kJ<br />
of energy. 11 Performing the same computati<strong>on</strong>, we would need to lift over<br />
6,000 kg (6 metric t<strong>on</strong>s) to a height of4mtogetthesame energy c<strong>on</strong>tent.<br />
Typical cars have masses in the 1,000–2,000 kg range, so we’re talking<br />
about something like 4 cars! One caveat is that we are not typically able<br />
to c<strong>on</strong>vert the thermal energy in gasoline 12 into useful work at much<br />
12: . . . via combusti<strong>on</strong>; see Sec. 6.4 (p. 88)<br />
better than 25%, while gravitati<strong>on</strong>al potential energy can be c<strong>on</strong>verted<br />
at nearly 100%. Still, being able to lift 1,500 kg 13 to a height of 4 m using<br />
the energy in 7 mL of gasoline is rather impressive, again emphasizing<br />
that gravitati<strong>on</strong>al potential energy is pretty weak. It <strong>on</strong>ly amounts to<br />
significance when the masses (volumes) of water are rather large.<br />
11: Thus, gasoline is nearly 20 times as<br />
energy-dense as a AA battery by volume.<br />
Usually, we will discuss energy density by<br />
mass, in which case the ∼5× denser battery<br />
provides nearly 100× less energy per gram<br />
than does gasoline.<br />
13: ...now just <strong>on</strong>e car, rather than four;<br />
it means this small volume of gasoline can<br />
propel a car up a4mhill<br />
11.2 Hydroelectric <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
The basic idea behind hydroelectricity is that water in a reservoir behind<br />
a dam (Figure 11.2) creates pressure at the base of the dam that can<br />
force water to flow through a turbine that drives a generator to make<br />
electricity—sharing elements of Fig. 6.2 (p. 90) but spinning the turbine<br />
by water flow instead. The amount of energy available works out to be<br />
the gravitati<strong>on</strong>al potential energy corresp<strong>on</strong>ding to the height of water<br />
at the lake’s surface relative to the water level <strong>on</strong> the other side. It’s as<br />
if dropping the water from the surface to the turbine <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> asking how<br />
much potential energy it gave up in the process. In reality, water is not<br />
dropping from the lake surface, but the force <strong>on</strong> the water at the turbine<br />
is determined by the height of water above it: the “pressure head,” as<br />
it is called. The process is highly efficient, approaching 90% capture of<br />
the potential energy in the water delivered as electrical power from the<br />
generator.<br />
reservoir<br />
high pressure<br />
turbine blades<br />
penstock<br />
h<br />
river<br />
Figure 11.2: Cross secti<strong>on</strong> of a dam, holding<br />
back a reservoir of water at height, h,over<br />
the downstream river.<br />
© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />
Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.