01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30<br />

3 Populati<strong>on</strong><br />

Underlying virtually every c<strong>on</strong>cern relating to our experience <strong>on</strong> this<br />

planet is the story of human populati<strong>on</strong>. The discussi<strong>on</strong> of c<strong>on</strong>tinued<br />

energy growth in Chapter 1 was based <strong>on</strong> the historical growth rate of<br />

energy, which is partly due to growing populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> partly due to<br />

increased use per capita. But the noti<strong>on</strong> that populati<strong>on</strong> will c<strong>on</strong>tinue an<br />

exp<strong>on</strong>ential climb, as is implicit in the Chapter 1 scenario, is impractical—<br />

<strong>on</strong>e of many factors that will render the “predicti<strong>on</strong>s” of Chapter 1<br />

invalid <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> prohibit “growth forever.”<br />

So let’s add a dose of reality <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> examine a more practical scenario.<br />

Americans’ per-capita use of energy is roughly five times the global<br />

average rate. If global populati<strong>on</strong> eventually doubles, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the average<br />

global citizen advances to use energy at the rate Americans currently<br />

do, 1 then the total scale of energy use would go up by a factor of 10,<br />

which would take 100 years at our mathematically c<strong>on</strong>venient 2.3%<br />

annual rate (see Eq. 1.5; p. 5). This puts a more realistic—<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> proximate—<br />

timescale <strong>on</strong> the end of energy growth than the fantastical extrapolati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

of Chapter 1.<br />

Although the focus of this chapter will be <strong>on</strong> the alarming rate of<br />

populati<strong>on</strong> growth, we should keep the energy <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> resource c<strong>on</strong>text in<br />

mind in light of the overall theme of this book. To this end, Figure 3.1<br />

shows the degree to which energy dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> has outpaced populati<strong>on</strong><br />

growth, when scaled vertically to overlap in the nineteenth century.<br />

From 1900 to 1950, per-capita energy c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> increased modestly,<br />

but then ballo<strong>on</strong>ed dramatically after 1950, so that today we have the<br />

equivalent of 25 billi<strong>on</strong> people <strong>on</strong> the planet operating at nineteenth<br />

century energy levels.<br />

Since populati<strong>on</strong> plays a giant role in our future trajectory, we need to<br />

better underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> its past. We can also gain some sense for theoretical<br />

3.1 Populati<strong>on</strong> History ...... 31<br />

3.2 Logistic Model ......... 33<br />

Overshoot ............ 35<br />

Logistic Projecti<strong>on</strong> ....... 38<br />

3.3 Demographic Transiti<strong>on</strong> ... 38<br />

Geographic C<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s . 41<br />

Transiti<strong>on</strong> Cost ......... 44<br />

3.4 Touchy Aspects ......... 46<br />

It’s Pers<strong>on</strong>al ........... 46<br />

Populati<strong>on</strong> Policy ....... 47<br />

3.5 Upshot: It Depends <strong>on</strong> Us .. 48<br />

3.6 Problems ............. 48<br />

1: . . . so that global average energy use per<br />

capita increases by a factor of five from<br />

where it is today<br />

Global Power (TW)<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1800 1850 1900 1950 2000<br />

year<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Populati<strong>on</strong> (Gppl)<br />

Figure 3.1: Populati<strong>on</strong> (red) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> energy dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

(blue) <strong>on</strong> the same plot, showing how<br />

much faster energy dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> (power) has<br />

risen compared to populati<strong>on</strong>, which translates<br />

to increasing per-capita usage. The<br />

vertical axes are scaled so that the curves<br />

overlap in the nineteenth century. [14–16].<br />

Photo Credit: Tom Murphy<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!