01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 Renewable Overview 172<br />

sun overhead, a solar panel has access to more light than the 48%<br />

depicted reaching the ground. If we can also capture the porti<strong>on</strong><br />

that <strong>on</strong> average is reflected by the ground <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> clouds, 35 what<br />

might we expect for the rate of energy reaching the ground (in<br />

W/m 2 ) if the input at the top of the atmosphere is 1,360 W/m 2 ?<br />

35: Recall, it’s a clear day; no clouds.<br />

12. Similar to Example 10.3.2, how much warmer would you expect<br />

36: i Water has a density of 1,000 kg per<br />

a 10 cm deep puddle of water 36 cubic meter <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a specific heat capacity of<br />

to get after an hour in full sun,<br />

4,184 J/kg/ ◦ C. Make up whatever area you<br />

if the water absorbs all the energy <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> does not lose it to the want; the answer should be the same for<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>ment?<br />

any pick.<br />

13. Comparing Table 10.2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Table 10.3, what is the most striking<br />

mismatch, 37 in terms of large potential vs. small c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to<br />

U.S. energy c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong>?<br />

37: In other words, for those sources that<br />

can be matched within the tables, which<br />

st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s out as the most underutilized relative<br />

to its input numbers?<br />

14. In <strong>on</strong>e day, a typical residential solar installati<strong>on</strong> might deliver<br />

about 10 kilowatt-hours of energy. Meanwhile, a gall<strong>on</strong> of gasoline<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tains about 37 kWh of thermal energy. But the two ought not<br />

be directly compared, as burning the gasoline inevitably loses a<br />

lot of energy as heat. Correcting the solar output to a thermal<br />

equivalent, 38 how many gall<strong>on</strong>s per day of gasoline could it 38: i Use the 37.5% factor discussed in<br />

the text.<br />

displace?<br />

15. The U.S. occupies about 2% of Earth’s surface area, thus collecting<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly part of the 83,000 TW absorbed at the surface. Compare the<br />

amount of solar power received by the U.S. to the total renewable<br />

power in Table 10.3. 39 By what factor are we “underutilizing” the<br />

solar input, under the simplifying assumpti<strong>on</strong> that we could use<br />

all of it?<br />

39: . . . since it’s almost all solar in ultimate<br />

origin<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!