Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3 Populati<strong>on</strong> 32<br />
In more recent years, the rate has fallen somewhat from the 1.7% fit<br />
of the last segment in Figure 3.4, to around 1.1%. Rounding down for<br />
c<strong>on</strong>venience, c<strong>on</strong>tinuati<strong>on</strong> at a 1% rate would increase populati<strong>on</strong> from<br />
7 billi<strong>on</strong> to 8 billi<strong>on</strong> people in less than 14 years. The math is the same as<br />
in Chapter 1, re-expressed here as<br />
P P 0 e ln(1+p)(t−t 0) , (3.1)<br />
where P 0 is the populati<strong>on</strong> at time t 0 , <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> P is the populati<strong>on</strong> at time t<br />
if the growth rate is steady at p. Inverting this equati<strong>on</strong>, 3 we have<br />
( )<br />
t − t 0 ln P<br />
P 0<br />
ln(1 + p) . (3.2)<br />
3: . . . recalling that that the natural log <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
exp<strong>on</strong>ential functi<strong>on</strong>s “undo” each other<br />
(as inverse functi<strong>on</strong>s)<br />
Example 3.1.1 We can use Eq. 3.1 to determine how many people we<br />
will have in the year 2100 if we c<strong>on</strong>tinue growing at a 1% rate, starting<br />
from 7 billi<strong>on</strong> in the year 2010. We set P 0 7 Gppl, 4 t 0 2010, p 0.01,<br />
then compute the populati<strong>on</strong> in 2100 to be P 7e ln 1.01·90 17 Gppl.<br />
4: Gppl is giga-people, or billi<strong>on</strong> people<br />
Eq. 3.2 is the form that was used to c<strong>on</strong>clude that increasing from 7 to<br />
8 Gppl takes less than 14 years at a 1% rate. The computati<strong>on</strong> looks The actual time for adding <strong>on</strong>e billi<strong>on</strong> people<br />
has lately been 12 years, as we have been<br />
like: ln(8/7)/ ln 1.01 13.4. Note that we need not include the factors<br />
growing at a rate slightly higher than 1%.<br />
of a billi<strong>on</strong> in the numerator <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> denominator, since they cancel in<br />
the ratio.<br />
Year Populati<strong>on</strong> Time Rate Doubling<br />
1804 1 Gppl — 0.4% 170<br />
1927 2 Gppl 123 0.8% 85<br />
1960 3 Gppl 33 1.9% 37<br />
1974 4 Gppl 14 1.9% 37<br />
1987 5 Gppl 13 1.8% 39<br />
1999 6 Gppl 12 1.3% 54<br />
2011 7 Gppl 12 1.2% 59<br />
2023 8 Gppl 12 1.1% 66<br />
Table 3.2: Populati<strong>on</strong> milest<strong>on</strong>es: dates at<br />
which we added another <strong>on</strong>e billi<strong>on</strong> living<br />
people to the planet. The Time <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Doubling columns are expressed in years.<br />
Around 1965, the growth rate got up to 2%,<br />
fora35yeardoubling time.<br />
Table 3.2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Figure 3.5 illustrate how l<strong>on</strong>g it has taken to add each<br />
billi<strong>on</strong> people, extrapolating to the 8 billi<strong>on</strong> mark (as of writing in 2020).<br />
The first billi<strong>on</strong> people obviously took tens of thous<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s of years, each<br />
new billi<strong>on</strong> people taking less time ever since. Growth rate peaked in<br />
the 1960s at 2% <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a doubling time of 35 years. The exp<strong>on</strong>ential rate is<br />
moderating now, but even 1% growth c<strong>on</strong>tinues to add a billi<strong>on</strong> people<br />
every 13 years, at this stage. A famous book by Paul Ehrlich called The<br />
Populati<strong>on</strong> Bomb [18], first published in 1968, expressed underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>able<br />
alarm at the 2% rate that had <strong>on</strong>ly increased to that point. The moderati<strong>on</strong><br />
to 1% since that period is reassuring, but we are not at all out of the<br />
woods yet. The next secti<strong>on</strong> addresses natural mechanisms for curbing<br />
growth.<br />
Populati<strong>on</strong> (Gppl)<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000<br />
year<br />
Figure 3.5: Graphical representati<strong>on</strong> of Table<br />
3.2, showing the time between each<br />
billi<strong>on</strong> people added [14, 15].<br />
© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />
Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.