Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1 Exp<strong>on</strong>ential Growth 9<br />
solar energy hitting the planet at 100% efficiency. But our planet is a<br />
tiny speck in space. Why not capture all the light put out by the sun,<br />
in a sphere surrounding the sun (called a Dys<strong>on</strong> sphere; see Box 1.3)?<br />
Now we’re talking some real power! The sun puts out 4 × 10 26 W. If it<br />
were a light bulb, this would be its label (putting the 100 W st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ard<br />
inc<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>escent bulb to shame). So the number is enormous. But the math<br />
is actually pretty easy to grasp. 11 Every century gets another factor of<br />
ten. To go from where we are now (18 × 10 12 W) to the solar regime<br />
is about 14 orders-of-magnitude. So in 1,400 years, 12 we would be at<br />
18 × 10 26 W, which is about 4.5 times the solar output. Therefore we<br />
would use the entire sun’s output in a time shorter than the 2,000-year<br />
run of our current calendar.<br />
11: Math becomes easier if you blur your<br />
visi<strong>on</strong> a bit <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> do not dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> lots of precisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
In this case, we essentially ignore<br />
everything but the exp<strong>on</strong>ent, recognizing<br />
that each century will increment it by 1, at<br />
our chosen 2.3% rate.<br />
12: In this case, the “real” answer would<br />
be 1,335 years, but why fret over the details<br />
for little gain or qualitative difference in the<br />
outcome?<br />
Box 1.3: Dys<strong>on</strong> Sphere C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />
If we took the material comprising the entire Earth (or Venus) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
created a sphere around the sun at the current Earth-Sun distance, it<br />
would be a shell less than 4 mm thick! And it’s not necessarily ideal<br />
material stock for building a high-tech sphere <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> solar panels. The<br />
earth’s atmosphere distributed over this area would be 0.015 m thick.<br />
D<strong>on</strong>’t hold your breath waiting for this to happen.<br />
Bypassing boring realism, we recognize that our sun is not the <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
star in the Milky Way galaxy. In fact, we estimate our galaxy to c<strong>on</strong>tain<br />
roughly 100 billi<strong>on</strong> stars! This seems infinite. A billi<strong>on</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>ds is just<br />
over 30 years, so no <strong>on</strong>e could count to 100 billi<strong>on</strong> in a lifetime. But<br />
let’s see: 100 billi<strong>on</strong> is 10 11 . Immediately, we see that we buy another 11<br />
centuries at our 2.3% rate. So it takes 1,100 years to go from c<strong>on</strong>suming<br />
our entire sun to all the stars in our galaxy! That’s 2,500 years from<br />
now, adding the two timescales, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> still a civilizati<strong>on</strong>-relevant time<br />
period. Leave aside the pesky fact that the scale of our galaxy is 100,000<br />
light years, so that we can’t possibly get to all the stars within a 2,500<br />
year timeframe. So even as a mathematical exercise, physics places yet<br />
another limit <strong>on</strong> how l<strong>on</strong>g we could c<strong>on</strong>ceivably expect to maintain our<br />
current energy growth trajectory.<br />
The unhinged game can c<strong>on</strong>tinue, pretending we could capture all the<br />
light put out by all the stars in all the galaxies in the visible universe.<br />
Because the visible universe c<strong>on</strong>tains about 100 billi<strong>on</strong> galaxies, we<br />
buy another 1,100 years. We can go even further, imagining c<strong>on</strong>verting<br />
all matter (stars, gas, dust) into pure energy (E mc 2 ), not limiting<br />
ourselves to <strong>on</strong>ly the light output from stars as we have so far. Even<br />
playing these unhinged games, we would exhaust all the matter in the<br />
visible universe within 5,000 years at a 2.3% rate. The exp<strong>on</strong>ential is a<br />
cruel beast. Table 1.3 summarizes the results.<br />
Table 1.3: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> limit timescales.<br />
Utilizing<br />
years until<br />
Solar, l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, 20% 250<br />
Solar, earth, 100% 390<br />
Entire Sun 1,400<br />
Entire Galaxy 2,500<br />
Light in Universe 3,600<br />
Mass in Universe 5,000<br />
By coincidence, the visible universe has<br />
about as many galaxies as our galaxy has<br />
stars. By “visible” universe, we mean everything<br />
within 13.8 billi<strong>on</strong> light years, which<br />
is as far as light has been able to travel since<br />
the Big Bang (see Sec. D.1; p. 392).<br />
The point is not to take seriously the timescales for c<strong>on</strong>quering the sun<br />
or the galaxy. But the very absurdity of the exercise serves to emphasize<br />
© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />
Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.