01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 Exp<strong>on</strong>ential Growth 9<br />

solar energy hitting the planet at 100% efficiency. But our planet is a<br />

tiny speck in space. Why not capture all the light put out by the sun,<br />

in a sphere surrounding the sun (called a Dys<strong>on</strong> sphere; see Box 1.3)?<br />

Now we’re talking some real power! The sun puts out 4 × 10 26 W. If it<br />

were a light bulb, this would be its label (putting the 100 W st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ard<br />

inc<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>escent bulb to shame). So the number is enormous. But the math<br />

is actually pretty easy to grasp. 11 Every century gets another factor of<br />

ten. To go from where we are now (18 × 10 12 W) to the solar regime<br />

is about 14 orders-of-magnitude. So in 1,400 years, 12 we would be at<br />

18 × 10 26 W, which is about 4.5 times the solar output. Therefore we<br />

would use the entire sun’s output in a time shorter than the 2,000-year<br />

run of our current calendar.<br />

11: Math becomes easier if you blur your<br />

visi<strong>on</strong> a bit <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> do not dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> lots of precisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

In this case, we essentially ignore<br />

everything but the exp<strong>on</strong>ent, recognizing<br />

that each century will increment it by 1, at<br />

our chosen 2.3% rate.<br />

12: In this case, the “real” answer would<br />

be 1,335 years, but why fret over the details<br />

for little gain or qualitative difference in the<br />

outcome?<br />

Box 1.3: Dys<strong>on</strong> Sphere C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />

If we took the material comprising the entire Earth (or Venus) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

created a sphere around the sun at the current Earth-Sun distance, it<br />

would be a shell less than 4 mm thick! And it’s not necessarily ideal<br />

material stock for building a high-tech sphere <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> solar panels. The<br />

earth’s atmosphere distributed over this area would be 0.015 m thick.<br />

D<strong>on</strong>’t hold your breath waiting for this to happen.<br />

Bypassing boring realism, we recognize that our sun is not the <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

star in the Milky Way galaxy. In fact, we estimate our galaxy to c<strong>on</strong>tain<br />

roughly 100 billi<strong>on</strong> stars! This seems infinite. A billi<strong>on</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>ds is just<br />

over 30 years, so no <strong>on</strong>e could count to 100 billi<strong>on</strong> in a lifetime. But<br />

let’s see: 100 billi<strong>on</strong> is 10 11 . Immediately, we see that we buy another 11<br />

centuries at our 2.3% rate. So it takes 1,100 years to go from c<strong>on</strong>suming<br />

our entire sun to all the stars in our galaxy! That’s 2,500 years from<br />

now, adding the two timescales, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> still a civilizati<strong>on</strong>-relevant time<br />

period. Leave aside the pesky fact that the scale of our galaxy is 100,000<br />

light years, so that we can’t possibly get to all the stars within a 2,500<br />

year timeframe. So even as a mathematical exercise, physics places yet<br />

another limit <strong>on</strong> how l<strong>on</strong>g we could c<strong>on</strong>ceivably expect to maintain our<br />

current energy growth trajectory.<br />

The unhinged game can c<strong>on</strong>tinue, pretending we could capture all the<br />

light put out by all the stars in all the galaxies in the visible universe.<br />

Because the visible universe c<strong>on</strong>tains about 100 billi<strong>on</strong> galaxies, we<br />

buy another 1,100 years. We can go even further, imagining c<strong>on</strong>verting<br />

all matter (stars, gas, dust) into pure energy (E mc 2 ), not limiting<br />

ourselves to <strong>on</strong>ly the light output from stars as we have so far. Even<br />

playing these unhinged games, we would exhaust all the matter in the<br />

visible universe within 5,000 years at a 2.3% rate. The exp<strong>on</strong>ential is a<br />

cruel beast. Table 1.3 summarizes the results.<br />

Table 1.3: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> limit timescales.<br />

Utilizing<br />

years until<br />

Solar, l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, 20% 250<br />

Solar, earth, 100% 390<br />

Entire Sun 1,400<br />

Entire Galaxy 2,500<br />

Light in Universe 3,600<br />

Mass in Universe 5,000<br />

By coincidence, the visible universe has<br />

about as many galaxies as our galaxy has<br />

stars. By “visible” universe, we mean everything<br />

within 13.8 billi<strong>on</strong> light years, which<br />

is as far as light has been able to travel since<br />

the Big Bang (see Sec. D.1; p. 392).<br />

The point is not to take seriously the timescales for c<strong>on</strong>quering the sun<br />

or the galaxy. But the very absurdity of the exercise serves to emphasize<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!