Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1 Exp<strong>on</strong>ential Growth 8<br />
10 13<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> Producti<strong>on</strong> Rate (Watts)<br />
10 12<br />
10 11<br />
10 10<br />
10 9<br />
10 8<br />
1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000<br />
year<br />
Figure 1.3: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> trajectory in the U.S. over<br />
a l<strong>on</strong>g period. The red line is an exp<strong>on</strong>ential<br />
at a 2.9% growth rate, which appears linear<br />
<strong>on</strong> a logarithmic plot.<br />
result; 2) this rate produces the mathematical c<strong>on</strong>venience of a factor of<br />
8<br />
10 increase every century.<br />
8: Fundamentally, this relates to the fact<br />
that the natural log of 10 is 2.30. The analog<br />
What follows is a flight of fancy that quickly becomes absurd, but we will<br />
chase it to staggering levels of absurdity just because it is fun, instructive,<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> mind-blowing. Bear in mind that what follows should not be taken<br />
of our future: rather, we can use the absurdity to predict<br />
how our future will not look!<br />
of Eq. 1.7 using 10 in place of 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> p 0.023<br />
for 2.3% growth rate will produce a factorof-ten<br />
timescale t 10 ≈ 100 years.<br />
as predicti<strong>on</strong>s 9 9: Do not interpret this secti<strong>on</strong> as predicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
of how our future will go.<br />
The sun deposits energy at Earth’s surface at a rate of about 1,000 W/m 2<br />
(1,000 Watts per square meter; we’ll reach a better underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing for<br />
these units in Chapter 5). Ignoring clouds, the projected area intercepting<br />
the sun’s rays is just A πR 2 ⊕ , where R ⊕ is the radius of the earth,<br />
around 6,400 km. Roughly a quarter of the earth’s surface is l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
adding it all up we get about 30 × 10 15 W hitting l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>. If we put solar<br />
panels <strong>on</strong> every square meter of l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>verting sunlight to electrical<br />
energy at 20% efficiency, 10 we keep 6 × 10 15 W. This is a little over 300<br />
times the current global energy usage rate of 18 TW. What an encouraging<br />
number! Lots of margin. How l<strong>on</strong>g before our growth would get us<br />
here? After <strong>on</strong>e century, we’re 10 times higher, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 100 times higher after<br />
two centuries. It would take about 2.5 centuries (250 years) to hit this<br />
limit. Then no more energy growth.<br />
But wait, why not also float panels <strong>on</strong> all of the ocean, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> also magically<br />
improve performance to 100%? Doing this, we can capture a whopping<br />
130 × 10 15 W, over 7,000 times our current rate. Now we’re talking about<br />
maxing out in just under 400 years. Each factor of ten is a century, so a<br />
factor of 10,000 would be four factors of ten (10 4 ), taking four centuries.<br />
So within 400 years, we would be at the point of using every scrap of<br />
Approximate numbers are perfectly fine for<br />
this exercise.<br />
10: 20% is <strong>on</strong> the higher end for typical<br />
panels.<br />
The merits of various alternative energy<br />
sources will be treated in later chapters, so<br />
do not use this chapter to form opini<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong><br />
the usefulness of solar power, for instance.<br />
In defiance of physical limits.<br />
10,000 is not too different from 7,000, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
“rounding up” helps us c<strong>on</strong>veniently make<br />
sense of the result, since a factor of 10,000<br />
is easier to interpret as four applicati<strong>on</strong>s of<br />
10×, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> thus 400 years.<br />
© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />
Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.