01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 Exp<strong>on</strong>ential Growth 8<br />

10 13<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> Producti<strong>on</strong> Rate (Watts)<br />

10 12<br />

10 11<br />

10 10<br />

10 9<br />

10 8<br />

1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000<br />

year<br />

Figure 1.3: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> trajectory in the U.S. over<br />

a l<strong>on</strong>g period. The red line is an exp<strong>on</strong>ential<br />

at a 2.9% growth rate, which appears linear<br />

<strong>on</strong> a logarithmic plot.<br />

result; 2) this rate produces the mathematical c<strong>on</strong>venience of a factor of<br />

8<br />

10 increase every century.<br />

8: Fundamentally, this relates to the fact<br />

that the natural log of 10 is 2.30. The analog<br />

What follows is a flight of fancy that quickly becomes absurd, but we will<br />

chase it to staggering levels of absurdity just because it is fun, instructive,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> mind-blowing. Bear in mind that what follows should not be taken<br />

of our future: rather, we can use the absurdity to predict<br />

how our future will not look!<br />

of Eq. 1.7 using 10 in place of 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> p 0.023<br />

for 2.3% growth rate will produce a factorof-ten<br />

timescale t 10 ≈ 100 years.<br />

as predicti<strong>on</strong>s 9 9: Do not interpret this secti<strong>on</strong> as predicti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

of how our future will go.<br />

The sun deposits energy at Earth’s surface at a rate of about 1,000 W/m 2<br />

(1,000 Watts per square meter; we’ll reach a better underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing for<br />

these units in Chapter 5). Ignoring clouds, the projected area intercepting<br />

the sun’s rays is just A πR 2 ⊕ , where R ⊕ is the radius of the earth,<br />

around 6,400 km. Roughly a quarter of the earth’s surface is l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

adding it all up we get about 30 × 10 15 W hitting l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>. If we put solar<br />

panels <strong>on</strong> every square meter of l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>verting sunlight to electrical<br />

energy at 20% efficiency, 10 we keep 6 × 10 15 W. This is a little over 300<br />

times the current global energy usage rate of 18 TW. What an encouraging<br />

number! Lots of margin. How l<strong>on</strong>g before our growth would get us<br />

here? After <strong>on</strong>e century, we’re 10 times higher, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 100 times higher after<br />

two centuries. It would take about 2.5 centuries (250 years) to hit this<br />

limit. Then no more energy growth.<br />

But wait, why not also float panels <strong>on</strong> all of the ocean, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> also magically<br />

improve performance to 100%? Doing this, we can capture a whopping<br />

130 × 10 15 W, over 7,000 times our current rate. Now we’re talking about<br />

maxing out in just under 400 years. Each factor of ten is a century, so a<br />

factor of 10,000 would be four factors of ten (10 4 ), taking four centuries.<br />

So within 400 years, we would be at the point of using every scrap of<br />

Approximate numbers are perfectly fine for<br />

this exercise.<br />

10: 20% is <strong>on</strong> the higher end for typical<br />

panels.<br />

The merits of various alternative energy<br />

sources will be treated in later chapters, so<br />

do not use this chapter to form opini<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong><br />

the usefulness of solar power, for instance.<br />

In defiance of physical limits.<br />

10,000 is not too different from 7,000, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

“rounding up” helps us c<strong>on</strong>veniently make<br />

sense of the result, since a factor of 10,000<br />

is easier to interpret as four applicati<strong>on</strong>s of<br />

10×, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> thus 400 years.<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!