Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A.10 Units Manipulati<strong>on</strong> 372<br />
we sought. 34 In this case, we end up with 1.04 × 10 20 J/year, which is<br />
what we were after.<br />
We just carried out unit c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong>s (in time) in Example A.10.2, when<br />
we multiplied by c<strong>on</strong>structs like 60 s/1 min. The key to unit c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
is to arrange a fracti<strong>on</strong> expressing the same physical thing in both the numerator<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> denominator, just using different units. So we’re looking for<br />
equivalent measures. Most of the time, <strong>on</strong>e of them will be 1, numerically,<br />
as in the following example.<br />
34: So units, h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>led carefully, can provide<br />
important clues as to how to get the problem<br />
right.<br />
Example A.10.3 We might want to c<strong>on</strong>vert the 1.04 × 10 20 J/year from<br />
Example A.10.2 into quadrilli<strong>on</strong> Btu per year. We know that 1 Btu is<br />
1,055 J, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> that a quadrilli<strong>on</strong> is 10 15 . So we arrange the following:<br />
1.04 × 10 20 J<br />
year · 1 Btu<br />
1, 055 J · 1 quadrilli<strong>on</strong> ≈<br />
10 15 100 quadrilli<strong>on</strong> Btu/year.<br />
Finally, units can help guide correct usage of factors in a problem. In<br />
Example A.10.3, what if we did not know whether to divide or multiply<br />
by 1,055? The fact that we wanted to eliminate Joules told us we needed<br />
the Joules in the denominator, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> so the relati<strong>on</strong> 1 Btu = 1,055 J told us<br />
the 1,055 travels with Joules <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> must be in the denominator.<br />
But what if we are faced with a problem whose applicati<strong>on</strong> is not as<br />
apparent? 35 Let’s explore how this might go in a less familiar setting.<br />
Example A.10.4 For some inexplicable reas<strong>on</strong>, you put a brick in the<br />
refrigerator, which is 20 ◦ C colder than the brick is, initially, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> want<br />
to find out how l<strong>on</strong>g it will take for the brick to cool off. The brick has<br />
a mass of 2.5 kg, will dump its heat into the refrigerator at a rate of<br />
So<br />
you feel overwhelmed by lack of familiarity, right? Good, because the<br />
units are here to help.<br />
35: ...orwed<strong>on</strong>’tknowtheformula, which<br />
is no bad thing, as we then have the chance<br />
to c<strong>on</strong>struct it from what we know, like a<br />
real expert!<br />
10 W (10 J/s), <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> has a specific heat capacity of 1,000 J/kg/ ◦ C. 36 36: This c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> means that kg <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ◦ C<br />
You want an answer in time units, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> see <strong>on</strong>e instance in the 10 J/s<br />
rate at which heat leaves the brick. To get sec<strong>on</strong>ds “up top,” you want<br />
to make sure the 10 W value is in the denominator. This puts Joules in<br />
the denominator, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> we d<strong>on</strong>’t want it to survive to the final answer.<br />
We notice Joules in the specific heat capacity thing in the numerator,<br />
so that thing must go in the numerator. Let’s take stock of where that<br />
leaves us.<br />
1 1, 000 J ·<br />
10 J/s kg ·◦ C 100<br />
s<br />
kg ·◦ C<br />
It looks like if we multiply by the mass in kg <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> multiply by the<br />
temperature difference, we’re home free. Doing so results in 5,000<br />
sec<strong>on</strong>ds. Whenever possible, try to extract the most c<strong>on</strong>text/intuiti<strong>on</strong><br />
out of an answer as you can. Does 5,000 sec<strong>on</strong>ds mean a lot to you?<br />
Divide by 60 (or multiply by 1 min<br />
60 s<br />
) to get 83 minutes. Better. Or another<br />
factor of 60 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> we’re at 1.4 hours. That seems like the most natural<br />
are both in the denominator together.<br />
© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />
Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.