01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13 Solar <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> 222<br />

Holding solar back is its intermittency 95 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> high up-fr<strong>on</strong>t cost. Intermittency<br />

can be solved by battery storage, but this can double the cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

require maintenance <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> periodic battery replacement. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally—as<br />

for many of our renewable opti<strong>on</strong>s—all of our society’s dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s 96 are<br />

not well met by electricity generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

95: ...lowcapacity factor that is weatherdependent<br />

96: . . . like transportati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> industrial<br />

processing<br />

Sizing up a PV installati<strong>on</strong> is fairly straightforward. Having first determined<br />

how many kWh per day are to be produced, <strong>on</strong> average, divide<br />

this by the kWh/m 2 /day value for the site, 97 which is essentially the<br />

number of hours of full-sun 98 equivalent, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> tends to be in the 4–6 hour 98: 1,000 W/m 2<br />

ballpark. This says how many kilowatts the array should produce in full<br />

sun (peak Watts). For instance, if <strong>on</strong>ly 10 kWh/day are needed, 99 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the regi<strong>on</strong> in questi<strong>on</strong> gets 5 kWh/m 2 /day, the system needs to operate<br />

at a peak power of 2 kW p , costing about $6k to purchase <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> install (grid<br />

tied). Inflating by 20% offsets unaccounted losses 100 to better match real<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

97: . . . either annual or m<strong>on</strong>thly<br />

99: . . . because you are careful about energy<br />

expenditures<br />

100: ...hot, dirty panels <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong><br />

efficiencies<br />

Solar thermal energy is another way to run a traditi<strong>on</strong>al steam-based<br />

power plant, using relatively low-tech mirrors <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> pipes to c<strong>on</strong>centrate<br />

solar energy into a heat-carrying fluid that can later make steam. Effective<br />

efficiencies are relatively low, 101 but <strong>on</strong> the bright side, the low-tech nature<br />

makes it fairly cheap, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the technique can accommodate some degree<br />

of thermal storage for use some hours into the evening. Anything 102<br />

starting from solar input has the potential to be a major player, given the<br />

∼100,000 TW scale of solar energy incident up<strong>on</strong> the earth.<br />

101: 3% of solar energy hitting the plant<br />

area ends up as electricity<br />

102: ...eveniftheefficiency is modest or<br />

low<br />

13.10 Problems<br />

1. If we had two m<strong>on</strong>ochromatic (single-wavelength) light sources—a<br />

green <strong>on</strong>e at λ 0.5 μm <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a near-infrared <strong>on</strong>e at λ 1.0 μm—<br />

each emitting phot<strong>on</strong>s at an energy rate of 1 W, 103 how does<br />

the number of phot<strong>on</strong>s emerging per sec<strong>on</strong>d from each source<br />

compare? Is it the same number for each because both are 1 W<br />

sources, or is it a different number—<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> by what factor, if so?<br />

103: Hint: recall that 1Wis1J/s.<br />

2. Overhead sunlight arrives <strong>on</strong> the surface of the earth at an intensity<br />

of about 1,000 W/m 2 . How many phot<strong>on</strong>s per sec<strong>on</strong>d strike a solar<br />

panel whose area is 1.6 square meters, if the typical wavelength is<br />

λ 0.5 μm?<br />

3. Using the setup in Problem 2, how many phot<strong>on</strong>s enter your pupil<br />

every sec<strong>on</strong>d if you look directly at the sun? When doing so, your<br />

pupil restricts to a diameter of about 2 mm.<br />

4. The dimmest stars we can see with our eyes are thirteen orders-ofmagnitude<br />

104 dimmer than the intensity of the sun. Building off<br />

of Problem 3, how many phot<strong>on</strong>s enter your eye per sec<strong>on</strong>d at this<br />

edge of detectability?<br />

104: 10 −13 times<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!