Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
D.3 Electrified Transport 400<br />
It is not impossible 24 to electrify l<strong>on</strong>g-haul trucking, but neither is it free<br />
of significant challenges. Certainly it is not as easy <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>venient as<br />
fossil fuels.<br />
24: Indeed, Tesla offers a Semi capable of<br />
500 mile range, but see this careful analysis<br />
[129] <strong>on</strong> the hardships.<br />
D.3.4 Buses<br />
Like cargo ships <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<strong>on</strong>g-haul trucks, public transit buses are <strong>on</strong> the<br />
go much of the time, favoring soluti<strong>on</strong>s that can drive all day <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
charge overnight. Given the stops <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> breaks, a typical bus may average<br />
30 km/hour <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> run 14 hours per day for a daily range of approximately<br />
400 km. At an average fuel ec<strong>on</strong>omy of 3.5 mpg (70 L/100 km), each day<br />
requires about 300 L or 220 kg of fuel—no problem for a fuel tank. The<br />
equivalent battery would need to be 4,500 kg (900 kWh; 2.3 kWh/km),<br />
occupying about three cubic meters. Size itself is not a problem: the roof<br />
of the bus could spread out a 0.15 m high pack covering a 2 m × 10 m<br />
patch. Buses typically are 10–15 t<strong>on</strong>s, so adding 4.4 t<strong>on</strong>s in battery is not<br />
a killer.<br />
Electrified transit is therefore in the feasible/practical camp. What makes<br />
it so—unlike the previous examples—is slow travel, modest daily ranges,<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ability to recharge overnight. Raw range efficiency is low, at<br />
2.3 kWh/km, but this drops to a more respectable 0.2 kWh/km per<br />
pers<strong>on</strong> for an average occupancy of 10 riders.<br />
For charging overnight, a metropolitan transit system running 50 routes<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 8 buses per route 25 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> therefore needs to charge 400 buses over<br />
6 hours at an average rate of 150 kW per bus 26 for a total dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> of<br />
instance.<br />
60 MW—equivalent to the electricity dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> of about 50,000 homes.<br />
26: . . . 900 kWh capacity <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 6 hours to<br />
25: A <strong>on</strong>e-hour <strong>on</strong>e-way route operating<br />
<strong>on</strong> a 15 minute schedule needs 4 buses in<br />
service in each directi<strong>on</strong> of the route, for<br />
D.3.5 Passenger Cars<br />
charge<br />
Passenger cars are definitely feasible <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> practical for some uses. Typically<br />
achieving 0.15–0.20 kWh/km, the average American car driving<br />
12,000 miles per year (about 50 km/day, <strong>on</strong> average) would need at least<br />
10 kWh capacity to satisfy average daily driving, but would need closer<br />
to 100 kWh to match typical ∼500 km ranges of gasoline cars.<br />
At a current typical cost of $200–300 per kWh, such a battery costs 27: Thus, l<strong>on</strong>g-range electric cars roughly<br />
$20,000 to $30,000, without the car. 27 The most basic home charger runs double the price.<br />
at 120 V <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 12 A, 28 multiplying to 1,440 W. A 100 kWh battery actually<br />
28: . . . satisfying the 80% safety limit for a<br />
takes closer to 110–120 kWh of input due to 80–90% charge efficiency. 15 A circuit<br />
Dividing 115 kWh by 1.44 kW leaves 80 hours 29 as the charge time.<br />
29: . . . 3.3 days!<br />
Table D.1 provides similar details for this <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> two other higher-power<br />
scenarios.<br />
The middle row of Table D.1 is most typical for home chargers <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> those<br />
found in parking lot charge stati<strong>on</strong>s, resulting in an effective charge speed<br />
of about 10 miles per hour, or 16 km/hr. This is a c<strong>on</strong>venient way to<br />
© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />
Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.