01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A.1 Relax <strong>on</strong> the Decimals 360<br />

What about √ 10 ∼ 3? 3 This implies that 3 × 3 ∼ 10, which is true 3: Really √ 10 ≈ 3.162.<br />

enough (because 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 are very close; <strong>on</strong>ly 10% different). This<br />

means if you pay me $30 per day for a m<strong>on</strong>th, I know immediately<br />

that’s about $1,000. Is the m<strong>on</strong>th 30 days, or 31? Who cares? Knowing<br />

I’ll have an extra ∼$1,000 is a good enough basis to make reas<strong>on</strong>able<br />

plans, so it’s very useful, if not precise.<br />

How about 10 3 ∼ 3?4 This <strong>on</strong>e is actually pretty similar to saying that 4: Really it’s about 3.333.<br />

√<br />

10 ∼ 3, since both imply 3 × 3 ∼ 10. To use another example, let’s say<br />

you l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a $100,000/yr job, but can <strong>on</strong>ly work for 4 m<strong>on</strong>ths (a third of<br />

a year). 5 If 10 3<br />

∼ 3, then you’d expect to get about $30,000. Why mess<br />

around being more precise? Taxes will be larger than the imprecisi<strong>on</strong><br />

anyway. Again, it’s good enough to have a sense, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> make plans.<br />

Much like we have multiplicati<strong>on</strong> tables stamped into our heads, it is<br />

often very useful to have a few reciprocals floating around to help us do<br />

quick mental math. Some examples are given in Table A.1 that multiply<br />

to 10. Students are encouraged to add more examples to the table, filling<br />

in the gaps with their favorite numbers.<br />

The values in Table A.1 are selected to multiply to 10, which is an arbitrary<br />

but c<strong>on</strong>venient choice. This lets us “wrap around” the table <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tinue<br />

past three down to 2.5, 2, etc. <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> learn that the entry for 1.5 would<br />

be 6.67. To make effective use of the table, forget where the decimal point<br />

is located! Think of the reciprocal of 8 as being “1.25–like,” meaning it<br />

might be 0.125, 12.5, or some other cousin. The essential feature is 125.<br />

Likewise, the reciprocal of 2.5 is going to start with a 4.<br />

5: M<strong>on</strong>ey examples often seem easier to<br />

mentally grasp because we deal with m<strong>on</strong>ey<br />

all the time. To the extent that m<strong>on</strong>ey examples<br />

are easier, it says that the math itself<br />

isn’t hard: the unfamiliar c<strong>on</strong>text is often<br />

what trips students up.<br />

Table A.1: Reciprocals, multiplying to 10.<br />

Number<br />

Reciprocal<br />

8 1.25<br />

6.67 1.5<br />

6 1.67<br />

5 2<br />

4 2.5<br />

3 ∼3<br />

Example A.1.2 How is Table A.1 useful to us? We can turn divisi<strong>on</strong><br />

problems, which tend to be mentally challenging, into more intuitive<br />

multiplicati<strong>on</strong> problems. Several examples may highlight their<br />

usefulness.<br />

What is <strong>on</strong>e eighth of 1,000? Rather than carry out divisi<strong>on</strong>, just<br />

multiply 1,000 by the reciprocal—a “125–like” number. In this case,<br />

the answer is 125. We can use comm<strong>on</strong> sense <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> intuiti<strong>on</strong> to reject<br />

1,250 as 1 8<br />

of 1,000, as we know the answer should be significantly<br />

smaller than 1,000. But 12.5 goes too far. Also, we can recognize that 1 8<br />

is not too far from <strong>on</strong>e-tenth, 6 <strong>on</strong>e-tenth of 1,000 would be 100, close<br />

to 125.<br />

6: This is where “blurry” numbers are useful:<br />

8 ∼ 10 if you squint.<br />

How many hours is <strong>on</strong>e minute? Now we are looking for <strong>on</strong>e-sixtieth<br />

( 1<br />

60<br />

) of an hour, so we pull out the “167–like” reciprocal <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> weigh<br />

1<br />

1<br />

the choices 0.167, 0.0167, 0.00167, etc. Well,<br />

60<br />

can’t be too far from<br />

100 ,<br />

which would be 0.01. We expect the result to be a little bigger than 1<br />

100 ,<br />

leaving us to have <strong>on</strong>e minute as 0.0167 of an hour.<br />

Now we do a few quick statements that may not match our table<br />

exactly for all cases, but you should be able to “read between the lines”<br />

using blurry numbers to rec<strong>on</strong>cile the statements. One out of seven<br />

Study Table A.1 for each of these statements<br />

to see how it might fit in.<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!