01.08.2021 Views

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet, 2021a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13 Solar <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> 224<br />

successful c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to PV current, starting with a green phot<strong>on</strong><br />

leaving the sun <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ending with an electr<strong>on</strong> crossing the juncti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

16. Many people have an instinctive reacti<strong>on</strong> to discount the < 20%PV<br />

panel efficiency as disappointingly low—perhaps thinking they<br />

should hold out for higher. Present a multi-point argument about<br />

why the efficiency is actually pretty good, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> why in practice it is<br />

plenty good enough to be practical.<br />

17. If aiming for a particular power output 109 from a PV array, describe 109: Make up your own number if it helps.<br />

explicitly/quantitatively how PV panel efficiency interacts with<br />

the physical size (area) of the array. For instance, what happens<br />

if the efficiency doubles or is cut in half, while keeping the same<br />

target output?<br />

18. Make the c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> between Figure 13.4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Figure 13.6 by<br />

drawing a zoom-in of the bottom left corner of <strong>on</strong>e of the cells in<br />

Figure 13.6.<br />

19. Figure 13.7 shows operati<strong>on</strong>al curves of a PV cell for different<br />

levels of illuminati<strong>on</strong>. If the illuminati<strong>on</strong> is low <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the panel<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tinues to operate at maximum power, 110 which changes the<br />

most compared to full-sun operati<strong>on</strong>: the voltage or the current?<br />

Why might lower light (fewer phot<strong>on</strong>s) directly c<strong>on</strong>nect to a lower<br />

current based <strong>on</strong> the physics of PV operati<strong>on</strong>?<br />

110: . . . largest rectangle that fits in curve<br />

20. Replicate the calculati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> page 206 (showing work) that starts<br />

with the surface of the sun being 5,770 K <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> finds that we receive<br />

1,360 W/m 2 at Earth.<br />

21. According to Figure 13.8, which c<strong>on</strong>tinent appears to have the<br />

most solar potential? How would you rate China? Do the largest<br />

populati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>/or largest energy c<strong>on</strong>sumers in the world tend<br />

to be well-aligned to the best solar resources?<br />

22. Examine Figure 13.9 to determine the insolati<strong>on</strong> at the “four<br />

corners” locati<strong>on</strong> where Ariz<strong>on</strong>a, New Mexico, Utah, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Colorado<br />

touch. Express this in both kWh/m 2 /day <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> in W/m 2 , showing<br />

how to c<strong>on</strong>vert from <strong>on</strong>e to the other.<br />

Just using this locati<strong>on</strong> as an unambiguous<br />

spot <strong>on</strong> the map.<br />

23. What is a typical value for hours of full-sun-equivalent 111 of solar 111: . . . full sun meaning 1,000 W/m 2<br />

exposure in the U.S. based <strong>on</strong> the map <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> native units in Figure<br />

13.9? Explain how you arrive at this.<br />

24. A 30 year study by the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Renewable <str<strong>on</strong>g>Energy</str<strong>on</strong>g> Lab 112 indicates 112: . . . called the Redbook study: [88]<br />

that in San Diego, a typical year delivers an annual average of<br />

5.0 kWh/m 2 /day of insolati<strong>on</strong> for a flat panel facing straight up.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>vert this to W/m 2 .<br />

25. The same study menti<strong>on</strong>ed in Problem 24 finds that worst year<br />

in San Diego delivered an annual average of 4.7 kWh/m 2 /day<br />

© 2021 T. W. Murphy, Jr.; Creative Comm<strong>on</strong>s Attributi<strong>on</strong>-N<strong>on</strong>Commercial 4.0 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Lic.;<br />

Freely available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambiti<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!